Behavioral treatment of migraine: current status and future directions
Abstract
The empirical support for three behavioral treatments (relaxation, biofeedback and cognitive therapy) for managing migraine headaches in children and adults is reviewed. Meta-analyses and evidence-based reports show that these approaches are of considerable value, they appear to work equally well when applied individually, in groups or in limited contact formats. Meta-analyses comparing behavioral and prophylactic medication show equivalent results. However, outcomes are optimized when these treatments are combined. Researchers are currently seeking to identify factors predictive of response to behavioral approaches. Patients experiencing medication-overuse, refractory, cluster or post-traumatic forms of headache or comorbid conditions present special challenges that can require intensive, comprehensive and multidisciplinary approaches to treatment. Behavioral treatments have met with mixed success for menstrual migraine in the few studies that have been conducted. This review concludes by highlighting directions for future research efforts such as importing treatments to settings where headache patients most often seek care and developing algorithms for optimizing combinations of behavioral and pharmacological treatments to enhance effectiveness, reduce costs, minimize dosing requirements and improve adherence to needed medications. Other research efforts include developing treatments that target the underlying pathophysiology more directly, gaining a greater understanding of mediators and moderators of behavioral treatments, exploiting e-technology for assessment and treatment, and assessing outcome in multiple ways--such as quality of life.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The efficacy of stress-oriented psychotherapeutic interventions, such as acceptance and commitment therapy and mindfulness, has been shown to be poor.
“the efficacy of stress-oriented psychotherapeutic interventions, such as acceptance and commitment therapy and mindfulness, has been shown to be poor [8–18]”
From Protocol and methods for testing the efficacy of well-being therapy in chronic migraine patients: a randomized controlled trial. (2018) · cites this paper as [8]
Current evidence on the efficacy of psychological interventions remains limited and unsatisfactory.
“Current evidence on the efficacy of psychological interventions remains limited and unsatisfactory [8–18]”
From Protocol and methods for testing the efficacy of well-being therapy in chronic migraine patients: a randomized controlled trial. (2018) · cites this paper as [8]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 64 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Andrasik, F.
- Affiliations
- Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (US)
- Corresponding author
- Andrasik, Frank
- ORCID
- Andrasik, Frank
- Venue
- Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 403-413
- ISSN
- 1473-7175 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-8360
- OpenAlex
- W2006822135
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Keywords
- migraine, behavior therapy, relaxation, biofeedback, cognitive therapy, migraine prophylaxis, medication overuse headache, cluster headache, post-traumatic headache, menstrual migraine, predictors of treatment response, medication adherence, e-technologies, quality of life
- MeSH terms
- Behavior Therapy, Biofeedback, Psychology, Forecasting, Humans, Migraine Disorders, Relaxation Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review