Cited by 43Migraine and Headache StudiesTemporomandibular Joint DisordersTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Behavioral treatment of migraine: current status and future directions

Andrasik, Frank·2004·Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics

Abstract

The empirical support for three behavioral treatments (relaxation, biofeedback and cognitive therapy) for managing migraine headaches in children and adults is reviewed. Meta-analyses and evidence-based reports show that these approaches are of considerable value, they appear to work equally well when applied individually, in groups or in limited contact formats. Meta-analyses comparing behavioral and prophylactic medication show equivalent results. However, outcomes are optimized when these treatments are combined. Researchers are currently seeking to identify factors predictive of response to behavioral approaches. Patients experiencing medication-overuse, refractory, cluster or post-traumatic forms of headache or comorbid conditions present special challenges that can require intensive, comprehensive and multidisciplinary approaches to treatment. Behavioral treatments have met with mixed success for menstrual migraine in the few studies that have been conducted. This review concludes by highlighting directions for future research efforts such as importing treatments to settings where headache patients most often seek care and developing algorithms for optimizing combinations of behavioral and pharmacological treatments to enhance effectiveness, reduce costs, minimize dosing requirements and improve adherence to needed medications. Other research efforts include developing treatments that target the underlying pathophysiology more directly, gaining a greater understanding of mediators and moderators of behavioral treatments, exploiting e-technology for assessment and treatment, and assessing outcome in multiple ways--such as quality of life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1586/14737175.4.3.403

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 43

Authors
Andrasik, F.
Affiliations
Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (US)
Corresponding author
Andrasik, Frank
Venue
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Published
2004-05
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
403-413
ISSN
  • 1473-7175 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8360
OpenAlex
W2006822135
Cited by
43
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
migraine, behavior therapy, relaxation, biofeedback, cognitive therapy, migraine prophylaxis, medication overuse headache, cluster headache, post-traumatic headache, menstrual migraine, predictors of treatment response, medication adherence, e-technologies, quality of life
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Biofeedback, Psychology, Forecasting, Humans, Migraine Disorders, Relaxation Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review