The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical and economic burden of antimicrobial resistance
Abstract
Knowledge of the clinical and economic impact of antimicrobial resistance is useful to influence programs and behavior in healthcare facilities, to guide policy makers and funding agencies, to define the prognosis of individual patients and to stimulate interest in developing new antimicrobial agents and therapies. There are a variety of important issues that must be considered when designing or interpreting studies into the clinical and economic outcomes associated with antimicrobial resistance. One of the most misunderstood issues is how to measure cost appropriately. Although imperfect, existing data show that there is an association between antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus, enterococci and Gram-negative bacilli and increases in mortality, morbidity, length of hospitalization and cost of healthcare. Patients with infections due to antimicrobial-resistant organisms have higher costs (US $6,000-30,000) than do patients with infections due to antimicrobial-susceptible organisms; the difference in cost is even greater when patients infected with antimicrobial-resistant organisms are compared with patients without infection. Given limited budgets, knowledge of the clinical and economic impact of antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections, coupled with the benefits of specific interventions targeted to reduce these infections, will allow for optimal control and improved patient safety. In this review, the authors discuss a variety of important issues that must be considered when designing or interpreting studies of the clinical and economic outcomes associated with antimicrobial resistance. Representative literature is reviewed regarding the associations between antimicrobial resistance in specific pathogens and adverse outcomes, including increased mortality, length of hospital stay and cost.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
Drummond, M. E., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198529446.001.0001 · Cited by 13,648
Cited by
An overview of the antimicrobial resistance mechanisms of bacteria
C Reygaert, W., & Department of Biomedical Sciences, O. U. W. B. S. O. M. (2018) · AIMS Microbiology · doi:10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.482 · Cited by 1,893
Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae
Russo, T. A., & Marr, C. M. (2019) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00001-19 · Cited by 1,311
Zilberberg, M. D., Shorr, A. F., Micek, S. T., Vazquez-Guillamet, C., & Kollef, M. H. (2014) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/preaccept-6556009101270526 · Cited by 340
Cerceo, E., Deitelzweig, S. B., Sherman, B. M., & Amin, A. N. (2016) · Microbial Drug Resistance · doi:10.1089/mdr.2015.0220 · Cited by 313
Public Knowledge, Attitudes, and Experience Regarding the Use of Antibiotics in Italy
Napolitano, F., Izzo, M. T., Di Giuseppe, G., & Angelillo, I. F. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084177 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Maragakis, L. L., Perencevich, E. N., & Cosgrove, S. E.
- Venue
- Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 751-763
- ISSN
- 1478-7210 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-8336
- OpenAlex
- W1963994312
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical and economic burden of antimicrobial resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1586/14787210.6.5.751
- The paper
- Maragakis, L. L., Perencevich, E. N., & Cosgrove, S. E. (2008). Clinical and economic burden of antimicrobial resistance. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1586/14787210.6.5.751
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.