Cited by 54Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and ApplicationsCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Proteomic cancer biomarkers from discovery to approval: it’s worth the effort

Open access
Li, Danni, Chan, Daniel W·2014·Expert Review of Proteomics

Abstract

The current landscape of cancer biomarkers is changing rapidly, with new and exciting developments. With the advances of proteomic technologies, many potential cancer biomarkers have been discovered. However, the number of new cancer biomarkers cleared or approved by the US FDA is rather limited. Although technological advances are important, clearly defining intended use, good study design and appropriate patient specimens are critical for the success of FDA approval. While obtaining FDA clearance/approval for newly developed and clinically useful cancer biomarkers has been slow, the reward for patient care could be enormous.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1586/14789450.2014.897614

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hellström I, 2003, Cancer Res, 63, 3695
  2. Wang M, 1979, Invest Urol, 17, 159
  3. Zhang Z, 2012, Rev Obstet Gynecol, 5, 35

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Li, D., & Chan, D. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Li, Danni
Venue
Expert Review of Proteomics
Published
2014-03-20
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
135-136
ISSN
  • 1478-9450 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8387
OpenAlex
W2143199634
Cited by
54
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Review of Proteomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R13CA177252, U24CA160036, U24CA115102)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
tumor markers, proteomics, biomarker discovery, FDA approval, regulatory approval, intended use, research design, clinical translation
MeSH terms
Humans, Neoplasms, Prognosis, Biomarkers, Tumor, Proteome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review