Cited by 2Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Absolute risk reduction may depend on the duration of the follow-up

Open access
Ferenci, Tamás·2017·Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Response to: Diamond DA and Ravnskov U. How statistical deception created the appearance that statins are safe and effective in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Expert Rev Clin Pharm 2015;8(2):201-210.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1586/17512433.2015.1102008

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ferenci, T.
Affiliations
Obuda University (HU)
Corresponding author
Ferenci, Tamás
Venue
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2015-11-02
Volume
10
Issue
12
Pages
1409-1410
ISSN
  • 1751-2433 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-2441
OpenAlex
W1938345370
Cited by
2
References
8
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
absolute risk reduction, follow-up duration, statins, cardiovascular disease prevention, primary prevention, secondary prevention, drug safety and efficacy
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Deception, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Secondary Prevention, Numbers Needed To Treat

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review