Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 16Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasWireless Power Transfer Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

In the wireless era: leadless pacing

Lee, Kathy L·2010·Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy

Abstract

Cardiac pacemakers have been the standard therapy for patients with bradyarrhythmias for several decades. The pacing lead is an integral part of the system that serves as a conduit for the delivery of energy pulses to stimulate the myocardium. However, it is also an Achilles tendon that directly causes most device complications both acutely during implant and chronically years afterwards. Both durability and optimization of the stimulation site are important areas of improvement for manufacturers and implanters. Elimination of the pacing lead and the utilization of other means for energy transfer is the only way to avoid lead complications and allow a better choice of stimulation site. Leadless pacing with ultrasound-mediated energy has been demonstrated in animals and humans in acute studies. This has aroused intense interest in the field of cardiac pacing. With concerted effort from the profession and the industry, leadless pacing may indeed become a realizable concept.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1586/erc.09.168

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Borek, 2008, J. Interv. Card. Electrophysiol., 23, 59, 10.1007/s10840-008-9249-7 · DOI
  2. Bax, 2005, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 46, 2168, 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.020 · DOI
  3. Barold, 2008, Heart, 94, 10, 10.1136/hrt.2007.119404 · DOI
  4. Van Deuren, 2007, Circulation, 116, 222
  5. Echt, 2006, Heart Rhythm, 3, 1202, 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.06.012 · DOI
  6. Lee, 2007, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 50, 877, 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.081 · DOI
  7. Lee, 2009, Heart Rhythm, 6, 742, 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.02.025 · DOI
  8. Sweeney, 2006, Heart Rhythm, 3, 1207, 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.06.025 · DOI
  9. Benditt, 2009, Heart Rhythm, 6, 749, 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.04.006 · DOI
  10. Wieneke, 2009, Pacing Clin. Eletrophysiol., 32, 177, 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.02200.x · DOI
  11. Loeb GE, Richmond FJR, Singh Jet al.RF-powered BIONS’s™ for stimulation and sensing. Presented at:26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. San Francisco, CA, USA, 1–5 September 2004.
  12. Ellozy, 2004, J. Vasc. Surg., 40, 405, 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.06.027 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lee, K. L.
Affiliations
Queen Mary Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Lee, Kathy L
Venue
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
Published
2010-02
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
171-174
ISSN
  • 1477-9072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8344
OpenAlex
W2094747110
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Power Transfer Systems
Keywords
cardiac pacemaker, pacemaker leads, lead complications, bradycardia, transcutaneous pacing
MeSH terms
Animals, Bradycardia, Equipment Design, Heart Failure, Humans, Pacemaker, Artificial, Transducers, Biomedical Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.