Mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke
Abstract
Acute ischemic stroke is the leading cause of severe disability and the third leading cause of death in the USA. Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) remains the most widely advocated treatment, but this therapy is limited by a narrow time window (<4.5 h after stroke onset), exclusion of patients with coagulopathy and recanalization rates of less than 50%. As a result, only 5% of acute stroke patients are treated with IV tPA. Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy may be employed, either as a standalone therapy or as an adjunct to IV tPA, and has several potential advantages, including a wider time window (up to 8 h), the capacity for use in coagulopathic patients and higher recanalization rates (up to 82%). Nonetheless, mechanical thrombectomy has engendered controversy because no randomized trials have yet been performed to support its use. In this article, we review the clinical applications of mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Ultimately, the results of ongoing trials are necessary to delineate the patient populations most likely to benefit from this therapy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
tPA is not safe for all patients, leading to only about 5% of stroke sufferers receiving tPA therapy.
“Furthermore, it is not safe for all patients, leading to only about 5% of stroke sufferers actually receiving tPA therapy [32].”
From MicroRNA‐21 protects neurons from ischemic death (2010) · cites this paper as [32]
tPA is the only drug available to stroke victims, with a limited window of about 4.5 hours from symptom onset.
“Currently, only one drug, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is available to stroke victims, and it has a limited window of about 4.5 hours from the onset of symptoms in which it can be used for treatment.”
From MicroRNA‐21 protects neurons from ischemic death (2010) · cites this paper as [32]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MicroRNA‐21 protects neurons from ischemic death
Buller, B., Liu, X., Wang, X., Zhang, R. L., Zhang, L., Hozeska‐Solgot, A., Chopp, M., & Zhang, Z. G. (2010) · The FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07818.x · Cited by 242 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fields, J. D., Lindsay, K., Liu, K. C., Nesbit, G. M., & Lutsep, H. L.
- Affiliations
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Venue
- Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 581-592
- ISSN
- 1477-9072 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-8344
- OpenAlex
- W1976040231
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
- Keywords
- mechanical thrombectomy, acute ischemic stroke, endovascular treatment, intravenous tissue plasminogen activator, recanalization, therapeutic time window, coagulopathy, adjunctive therapy, clinical trials
- MeSH terms
- Acute Disease, Blood Coagulation Disorders, Brain Ischemia, Combined Modality Therapy, Fibrinolytic Agents, Humans, Tissue Plasminogen Activator, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Thrombectomy, Stroke
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review