The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Taking Digital Health to the Next Level: Promoting Technologies That Empower Consumers and Drive Health System Transformation
Open accessAbstract
Digital health technologies offer the potential to transform health care by making it more responsive to consumers' needs, convenient for patients to access, and efficient and satisfying for providers to deliver.Yet there are significant barriers to the adoption of such technologies, including a dearth of evidence of their impact on cost and outcomes and a lack of collaboration between clinicians and technologists in product development.In this report, we draw on the views and experiences of experts and innovators in the field to make recommendations for overcoming such barriers.These include: defining opportunities to focus on the country's greatest health and delivery system problems; closing knowledge gaps among consumers, technology developers, entrepreneurs, health care executives, and investors; creating test beds in care settings; enabling consumer-centered design and valuations of new technologies; and addressing operational factors and challenges related to an evolving reimbursement and policy landscape.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Although digital self-help interventions can have positive effects, to optimise their benefits it is thus vital that they are systematically developed in a process of co-creation with stakeholders and patients (Klein et al., 2014; Scott et al., 2017; Knight et al., 2021).”
From Strength Back – A qualitative study on the co-creation of a positive psychology digital health intervention for spinal surgery patients (2023) · cites this paper as Klein et al., 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 4 · Cited by 9
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- "StartUp Health Receives Two-Year Grant from Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to Accelerate Innovation in Underserved Communities, " Robert Wood Johnson Foundation press release, Dec. 2, 2013, http://www. rwjf.org/en/about-rwjf/newsroom/newsroom-con- tent/2013/12/startup-health-receives-two-year-grant- from-robert-wood-johnson-.html.
- Ostrovsky, N. Deen, A. Simon et al., A Framework for Selecting Digital Health Technology (Cambridge, Mass.: Institute for Healthcare Improvement, June 2014), http://www.ihi.org/ resources/Pages/Publications/AFrameworkfor SelectingDigitalHealthTechnology.aspx.
- A. C. Powell, A. B. Landman, and D. W. Bates, "In Search of a Few Good Apps, " Journal of the American Medical Association, May 14, 2014 311(18):1851-52.
- A. Ostrovsky and M. Barnett, "Accelerating Change: Fostering Innovation in Healthcare Delivery at Academic Medical Centers, " Healthcare, March 2014 2(1):9-10, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti- cle/pii/S221307641300081X. Ostrovsky and Barnett point out that most academic medical centers have not yet invested in health care delivery innovation because it falls outside of their traditional focus on basic research and does not yet play a role in academic career advancement.
Metadata
- Authors
- Klein, S. K., McCarthy, D. M., & Hostetter, M. H.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Publisher
- Commonwealth Fund
- Published
- 2014-10-01
- OpenAlex
- W4213200280
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Issue Lab (Candid) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Commonwealth Fund
- Yale University
- University of Connecticut
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
- Keywords
- digital health technologies, health system transformation, consumer empowerment, technology adoption barriers, health care delivery, reimbursement policy, health technology assessment, healthcare innovation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
