Cited by 7Cryptographic Implementations and SecurityAdvanced Data Storage TechnologiesCoding theory and cryptography

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Data security concurrent with homogeneous by AES algorithm in SSD controller

Open access
Fan, Lingyan, Luo, Jianjun, Liu, Hailuan, Geng, Xuan·2014·IEICE Electronics Express

Abstract

AES has been one of the most popular encryption and decryption algorithms for data security applications. At the same time, data randomization (or “homogeneous”) technology was applied to reduce the bit error rate (BER) of MLC and TLC flash memory. Here, AES algorithm was found efficient to replace the orthogonal polynomials which normally carry out homogeneous function by scrambling data. This paper put forward a novel hardware architecture providing both homogeneous and data encryption/decryption functions concurrently by an embedded AES hardware engine while getting rid of randomization engine with Linear Feedback Shift Register (LFSR). It made a flash controller simple and reduced the die size because the independent homogeneous hard engine is no longer necessary for a flash memory system, in which AES security algorithm embedded. Finally a SSD controller designed in this architecture was silicon proven.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1587/elex.11.20140535

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • A New Steel Defect Detection Algorithm Based on Deep Learning

    Zhao, W., Chen, F., Huang, H., Li, D., & Cheng, W. (2021) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2021/5592878 · Cited by 259

    “Faster R-CNN is the mainstream two-stage target detection algorithm, which is used in face detection and defect detection widely. detection accuracy of Faster R-CNN is higher than SSD [32, 33], Fast R-CNN [34], and other algorithms verified on multiple datasets.”
    Method

See all 7

Metadata

Authors
Fan, L., Luo, J., Liu, H., & Geng, X.
Affiliations
  • Hangzhou Dianzi University (CN)
  • Sage Microelectronics Corporation
  • Shanghai Maritime University (CN)
Venue
IEICE Electronics Express
Published
2014
Volume
11
Issue
13
Pages
20140535-20140535
ISSN
1349-2543 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072644400
Cited by
7
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
IEICE Electronics Express (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Data Storage Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics › Coding theory and cryptography
Keywords
AES, flash memory, data randomization, data encryption, hardware architecture, linear feedback shift registers, bit error rate reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review