The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fast Local Algorithms for Large Scale Nonnegative Matrix and Tensor Factorizations
Abstract
Nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) and its extensions such as Nonnegative Tensor Factorization (NTF) have become prominent techniques for blind sources separation (BSS), analysis of image databases, data mining and other information retrieval and clustering applications. In this paper we propose a family of efficient algorithms for NMF/NTF, as well as sparse nonnegative coding and representation, that has many potential applications in computational neuroscience, multi-sensory processing, compressed sensing and multidimensional data analysis. We have developed a class of optimized local algorithms which are referred to as Hierarchical Alternating Least Squares (HALS) algorithms. For these purposes, we have performed sequential constrained minimization on a set of squared Euclidean distances. We then extend this approach to robust cost functions using the alpha and beta divergences and derive flexible update rules. Our algorithms are locally stable and work well for NMF-based blind source separation (BSS) not only for the over-determined case but also for an under-determined (over-complete) case (i.e., for a system which has less sensors than sources) if data are sufficiently sparse. The NMF learning rules are extended and generalized for N-th order nonnegative tensor factorization (NTF). Moreover, these algorithms can be tuned to different noise statistics by adjusting a single parameter. Extensive experimental results confirm the accuracy and computational performance of the developed algorithms, especially, with usage of multi-layer hierarchical NMF approach [3].
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Differential-Geometrical Methods in Statistics
Amari, S.-I. (1985) · Lecture Notes in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5056-2 · Cited by 1,673
Cited by
Xu, Y., & Yin, W. (2013) · SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences · doi:10.1137/120887795 · Cited by 1,160
Nonnegative Matrix Factorization: A Comprehensive Review
Wang, Y.-X., & Zhang, Y.-J. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2012.51 · Cited by 981
PadChest: A large chest x-ray image dataset with multi-label annotated reports
Bustos, A., Pertusa, A., Salinas, J.-M., & de la Iglesia-Vayá, M. (2020) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101797 · Cited by 691
Kim, J., He, Y., & Park, H. (2014) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1007/s10898-013-0035-4 · Cited by 352
NeuroQuery, comprehensive meta-analysis of human brain mapping
Dockès, J., Poldrack, R. A., Primet, R., Gözükan, H., Yarkoni, T., Suchanek, F., Thirion, B., & Varoquaux, G. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.53385 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- CICHOCKI, A., & PHAN, A.-H.
- Venue
- IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- E92-A
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 708-721
- ISSN
- 0916-8508 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1337
- OpenAlex
- W2026034143
- Cited by
- 575
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fast Local Algorithms for Large Scale Nonnegative Matrix and Tensor Factorizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1587/transfun.e92.a.708
- The paper
- CICHOCKI, A., & PHAN, A.-H. (2009). Fast Local Algorithms for Large Scale Nonnegative Matrix and Tensor Factorizations. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1587/transfun.e92.a.708
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.