FPGA Implementation of Metastability-Based True Random Number Generator
Open accessAbstract
True random number generators (TRNGs) are important as a basis for computer security. Though there are some TRNGs composed of analog circuit, the use of digital circuits is desired for the application of TRNGs to logic LSIs. Some of the digital TRNGs utilize jitter in free-running ring oscillators as a source of entropy, which consume large power. Another type of TRNG exploits the metastability of a latch to generate entropy. Although this kind of TRNG has been mostly implemented with full-custom LSI technology, this study presents an implementation based on common FPGA technology. Our TRNG is comprised of logic gates only, and can be integrated in any kind of logic LSI. The RS latch in our TRNG is implemented as a hard-macro to guarantee the quality of randomness by minimizing the signal skew and load imbalance of internal nodes. To improve the quality and throughput, the output of 64-256 latches are XOR'ed. The derived design was verified on a Xilinx Virtex-4 FPGA (XC4VFX20), and passed NIST statistical test suite without post-processing. Our TRNG with 256 latches occupies 580 slices, while achieving 12.5Mbps throughput.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 115
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Shuichi Ichikawa received his D.S. de- gree in Information Science from the Univer- sity of Tokyo in 1991. He was affiliated with Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Nagoya Uni- versity, and Toyohashi University of Technol- ogy. Since April 2011, he is a professor of Numazu National College of Technology. His research interests include parallel processing, high-performance computing, and custom com- puting systems, and computer security. He is a member of IEEE, ACM, and IPSJ.
- Authors
- HATA, H., & ICHIKAWA, S.
- Affiliations
- Toyohashi University of Technology (JP)
- Department of Knowledge-based Information Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology
- Venue
- IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- E95.D
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 426-436
- ISSN
- 0916-8532 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1361
- OpenAlex
- W2161890359
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (23500061)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
- Keywords
- true random number generator, metastability, FPGA implementation, entropy source, NIST statistical tests, logic LSI
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review