Cited by 15Mercury impact and mitigation studiesHeavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityIndigenous Health and Education

Mercury exposure of children living in Amazonian villages: influence of geographical location where they lived during prenatal and postnatal development

Open access
FREITAS, JOYCE S., LACERDA, ELIZA MARIA C.B., RODRIGUES JÚNIOR, DARIO, CORVELO, TEREZA CRISTINA O., SILVEIRA, LUIZ CARLOS L., PINHEIRO, MARIA DA CONCEIÇÃO N., SOUZA, GIVAGO S.·2019·Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In some Amazonian river basins, hair mercury concentration is above the recommended levels. We evaluated the influence of birth geographical location in the hair mercury level of Amazonian riverine children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hair mercury concentration was measured in 219 children living in four Amazonian riverine communities: Tapajós River (São Luiz do Tapajós and Barreiras villages, n = 110), Tocantins River (Limoeiro do Ajurú village, n = 61), and Caeté River (Caratateua village, n = 48). We used Poisson regression analysis to evaluate the association between native and non-native children from each village and its hair mercury concentration. RESULTS: Higher mercury exposure was found in native children from São Luiz do Tapajós (range = 0.81-22.38 µg/g) followed by native children from Barreiras (range = 0.48-13.46 µg/g), non-native children from São Luiz do Tapajós (range = 0.26-22.18 µg/g), non-native children from Barreiras (range = 0.43-20.76 µg/g), followed by the children from Caeté and Tocantins river basins. We observed that Tapajós villages' native children had higher prevalence of mercury exposure children than other children (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Birth geographical location has association to mercury levels in the hair of children who lived in a same community with history of mercury exposure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/0001-3765201920180097

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. COSSA D, COQUeRY m, GOBeIl C AND mARTIN Jm. 1986. mercury fluxes at the ocean margins. In: Baeyens W, ebinghaus R and Vasiliev O (eds), Global and regional mercury cycles: sources, fluxes and mass balances. NATO ASI Series, Vol. 2. Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 229- 247.
  2. PASSOS CJ AND meRGleR D. 2008. human mercury exposure and adverse health effects in the Amazon: a review. Cad Saúde Pública 24: 503-520.
  3. SIlVeIRA lCl, DAmIN eTB, PINheIRO mCN, RODRIGUeS AR, mOURA AlA, CÔRTeS mIT AND mellO GA. 2003. Visual dysfunction following mercury exposure by breathing mercury vapour or by eating mercury-contaminated food. In: mollon JD, Pokorny J and Knoblauch K (eds), Normal and defective colour vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 407-417.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FREITAS, J. S., LACERDA, E. M. C. B., RODRIGUES JÚNIOR, D., CORVELO, T. C. O., SILVEIRA, L. C. L., PINHEIRO, M. D. C. N., & SOUZA, G. S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Pará (BR)
  • Universidade do Ceuma, Brazil
  • Universidade Federal do Pará, Brazil
  • Universidade Federal do Pará, Brazil; Universidade Federal do Pará, Brazil
  • Universidade Ceuma (BR)
Venue
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências
Published
2019
Volume
91
Issue
suppl 1
Pages
e20180097-e20180097
ISSN
  • 0001-3765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1678-2690
OpenAlex
W2938236816
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (442191/2014-6)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Health and Education
Keywords
mercury exposure, hair mercury, children, Amazonian riverine communities, birthplace, prenatal exposure, postnatal development, Tapajós River, Tocantins River, indigenous children, environmental contamination
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brazil, Child, Child Development, Environmental Exposure, Female, Hair, Humans, Male, Mercury, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Rivers, Geography, Medical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review