Mercury exposure of children living in Amazonian villages: influence of geographical location where they lived during prenatal and postnatal development
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: In some Amazonian river basins, hair mercury concentration is above the recommended levels. We evaluated the influence of birth geographical location in the hair mercury level of Amazonian riverine children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hair mercury concentration was measured in 219 children living in four Amazonian riverine communities: Tapajós River (São Luiz do Tapajós and Barreiras villages, n = 110), Tocantins River (Limoeiro do Ajurú village, n = 61), and Caeté River (Caratateua village, n = 48). We used Poisson regression analysis to evaluate the association between native and non-native children from each village and its hair mercury concentration. RESULTS: Higher mercury exposure was found in native children from São Luiz do Tapajós (range = 0.81-22.38 µg/g) followed by native children from Barreiras (range = 0.48-13.46 µg/g), non-native children from São Luiz do Tapajós (range = 0.26-22.18 µg/g), non-native children from Barreiras (range = 0.43-20.76 µg/g), followed by the children from Caeté and Tocantins river basins. We observed that Tapajós villages' native children had higher prevalence of mercury exposure children than other children (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Birth geographical location has association to mercury levels in the hair of children who lived in a same community with history of mercury exposure.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many studies have already shown mercury contamination in the fauna of the Tapajós River Basin at least two decades ago.
“Many studies have already shown mercury contamination in the fauna of the Tapajós River Basin at least two decades ago [55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65].”
From Health Risk Assessment of Mercury Exposure from Fish Consumption in Munduruku Indigenous Communities in the Brazilian Amazon (2021) · cites this paper as [64]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- COSSA D, COQUeRY m, GOBeIl C AND mARTIN Jm. 1986. mercury fluxes at the ocean margins. In: Baeyens W, ebinghaus R and Vasiliev O (eds), Global and regional mercury cycles: sources, fluxes and mass balances. NATO ASI Series, Vol. 2. Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 229- 247.
- PASSOS CJ AND meRGleR D. 2008. human mercury exposure and adverse health effects in the Amazon: a review. Cad Saúde Pública 24: 503-520.
- SIlVeIRA lCl, DAmIN eTB, PINheIRO mCN, RODRIGUeS AR, mOURA AlA, CÔRTeS mIT AND mellO GA. 2003. Visual dysfunction following mercury exposure by breathing mercury vapour or by eating mercury-contaminated food. In: mollon JD, Pokorny J and Knoblauch K (eds), Normal and defective colour vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 407-417.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vasconcellos, A. C. S. D., Hallwass, G., Bezerra, J. G., Aciole, A. N. S., Meneses, H. N. D. M., Lima, M. D. O., Jesus, I. M. D., Hacon, S. D. S., & Basta, P. C. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18157940 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
- Authors
- FREITAS, J. S., LACERDA, E. M. C. B., RODRIGUES JÚNIOR, D., CORVELO, T. C. O., SILVEIRA, L. C. L., PINHEIRO, M. D. C. N., & SOUZA, G. S.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal do Pará (BR)
- Universidade do Ceuma, Brazil
- Universidade Federal do Pará, Brazil
- Universidade Federal do Pará, Brazil; Universidade Federal do Pará, Brazil
- Universidade Ceuma (BR)
- Venue
- Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- suppl 1
- Pages
- e20180097-e20180097
- ISSN
- 0001-3765 (ISSN-L)
- 1678-2690
- OpenAlex
- W2938236816
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (442191/2014-6)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Mercury impact and mitigation studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Health and Education
- Keywords
- mercury exposure, hair mercury, children, Amazonian riverine communities, birthplace, prenatal exposure, postnatal development, Tapajós River, Tocantins River, indigenous children, environmental contamination
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Brazil, Child, Child Development, Environmental Exposure, Female, Hair, Humans, Male, Mercury, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Rivers, Geography, Medical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review