Ecotoxicological effects of swine manure on Folsomia candida in subtropical soils
Open accessAbstract
The production model used in Brazilian pig farms promotes a concentration of animals in small territorial extensions, causing difficulty in disposing of the manure generated, since the economically viable alternative is to use this as an agricultural fertilizer. The objective was to evaluate the effect of swine manure doses on the biological and behavioral parameters in Folsomia candida by ecotoxicological tests. An Ultisol, Oxisol and Tropical Artificial Soil (TAS) were contaminated with 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 m3 ha-1 of swine manure, to which springtails were exposed for evaluation of mortality, and the doses 0, 10, 15, 20 and 25 m3 ha-1 of swine manure to evaluated reproduction and avoidance. Lethality was observed in all doses as well as all soils, indicating toxicity of the manure. In the reproduction tests dose since 10 m3 ha-1 caused a reduction of juveniles in all soils. Avoidance behavior was observed in all doses of the Oxisol treatments and at 20 and 25 m3 ha-1 in Ultisol treatments. However, in TAS occurred not avoidance response of F. candida. We conclude that the swine manure was toxic to F. candida and the toxicity is dependent on the soil characteristics and the manure concentrations applied.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 4
- Authors
- SEGAT, J. C., ALVES, P. R. L., BARETTA, D., & CARDOSO, E. J. B. N.
- Affiliations
- Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (BR)
- Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul (BR)
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- Corresponding author
- SEGAT, JULIA C.
- Venue
- Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- suppl 2
- Pages
- e20180758-e20180758
- ISSN
- 0001-3765 (ISSN-L)
- 1678-2690
- OpenAlex
- W3095907279
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- pt
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Figshare (cc-by)
- Funders
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies
- Keywords
- pig manure, Folsomia candida, Collembola, soil ecotoxicity, manure application rate, avoidance behavior, reproduction, mortality, Ultisol, Oxisol, soil properties, pig farming, manure application
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Arthropods, Brazil, Manure, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Swine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
