The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Construction and validation of an Educational Content Validation Instrument in Health
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT Objective: to construct and validate the Educational Content Validation Instrument in Health. Method: methodological study that includes the establishment of the conceptual structure; definition of objectives and population; construction of items and response scale; selection and arrangement of items; instrument structuring; opinion of experts; pre-test and content validation. Results: an instrument with 15 items was constructed and, after expert evaluation, eighteen items were obtained, divided into three domains: objectives (four), structure/presentation (nine), and relevance (two). Six items were modified since they presented a percentage of agreement below 0.8. Items of the total instrument presented good internal consistency (0.877) regarding domains. Conclusion: an Educational Content Validation Instrument in Health was elaborated and validated, presenting good reliability, and may contribute to the practice of researchers and health professionals in the development of educational content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2010) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8 · Cited by 4,260
How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques
McMillan, S. S., King, M., & Tully, M. P. (2016) · International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy · doi:10.1007/s11096-016-0257-x · Cited by 1,491
Essential elements of questionnaire design and development
Rattray, J., & Jones, M. C. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x · Cited by 1,484
Construção de instrumentos de medida na área da saúde
Coluci, M. Z. O., Alexandre, N. M. C., & Milani, D. (2015) · Ciência & Saúde Coletiva · doi:10.1590/1413-81232015203.04332013 · Cited by 547
Introduction to health measurement scales
Keszei, A. P., Novak, M., & Streiner, D. L. (2010) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.01.006 · Cited by 490
The problem with health measurement
Cano, S., Cano, S., & Hobart (2011) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s14399 · Cited by 170
Health education and its theoretical perspectives: a few reflections
Salci, M. A., Maceno, P., Rozza, S. G., da Silva, D. M. G. V., Boehs, A. E., & Heidemann, I. T. S. B. (2013) · Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem · doi:10.1590/s0104-07072013000100027 · Cited by 77
Development and Validation of Educational Leaflet for Caregivers of Preterm Infants
Khurana, S. G. (2016) · JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH · doi:10.7860/jcdr/2016/19206.8109 · Cited by 23
Sharma, S., Akhtar, F., Singh, R. K., & Mehra, S. (2019) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare8010008 · Cited by 20
Segabinazi, J. D., Zortéa, M., Zanon, C., Bandeira, D. R., Giacomoni, C. H., & Hutz, C. S. (2012) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Leite, S. D. S., Áfio, A. C. E., Carvalho, L. V. D., Silva, J. M. D., Almeida, P. C. D., & Pagliuca, L. M. F.
- Venue
- Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- suppl 4
- Pages
- 1635-1641
- ISSN
- 0034-7167 (ISSN-L)
- 1984-0446
- OpenAlex
- W2887663175
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 67.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Construction and validation of an Educational Content Validation Instrument in Health. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0648
- The paper
- Leite, S. D. S., Áfio, A. C. E., Carvalho, L. V. D., Silva, J. M. D., Almeida, P. C. D., & Pagliuca, L. M. F. (2018). Construction and validation of an Educational Content Validation Instrument in Health. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0648
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
