CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 31Political Science Research and EducationInternational Relations and Foreign PolicyGlobalization and political ideologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Towards the Global Study of International Relations

Open access
Hurrell, Andrew·2016·Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional
DOI 10.1590/0034-7329201600208
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This article reviews recent critiques of the wester-centrism of mainstream International Relations. It argues that the overriding challenge is to try to move beyond critique and to develop a global study of international relations that insists on the importance of the systemic, of the global, but that also takes the critiques seriously and builds on them productively.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/0034-7329201600208

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Cohen J.L., 2014, Reply to Scheuerman's review of 'Globalization and Sovereignty'., Global Constitutionalism, 3, 119, 10.1017/S2045381713000257 · DOI
  2. Goto-Jones C., 2010, Comparative Political Thought: Beyond the Non-Western, 219
  3. Hurrell A., 2010, Cardoso and the World, 473
  4. Jenco L.K., 2007, "What does Heaven Ever Say?" A Methods-Centered Approach to Cross-Cultural Engagement, American Political Science Review, 101, 741, 10.1017/S0003055407070463 · DOI
  5. Johnston A.I., 2012, What (if anything) does East Asia tell us about International Relations Theory?, Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 53, 10.1146/annurev.polisci.040908.120058 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Koskenniemi M., 2012, Law, Teleology and International Relations: An Essay in Counter-Disciplinarity, International Relations, 26, 3, 10.1177/0047117811433080 · DOI
  7. Laffey M., 2012, The Hybridity of the Liberal Peace: States, Diaporas and Insecurity, Security Dialogue, 43, 403, 10.1177/0967010612457974 · DOI
  8. Mackinder H.J., 1904, The Geographical Pivot of History, The Geographical Journal, 23, 421, 10.2307/1775498 · DOI
  9. Manjapra K., 2010, Introduction, 1
  10. Pagden A., 2000, Stoicism, Cosmopolitanism, and the Legacy of European Imperialism, Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory, 7, 3, 10.1111/1467-8675.00167 · DOI
  11. Seth S., 2002, Back to the Future?, Third World Quarterly, 23, 565, 10.1080/01436590220138330 · DOI
  12. Smith R.M., 2004, Identities, Interests and the Future of Political Science, Perspectives on Politics, 2, 301, 10.1017/S1537592704040174 · DOI
  13. Tsai K., 2013, China's Political Economy and Political Science, Perspectives on Politics, 11, 860, 10.1017/S1537592712003222 · DOI
  14. Williams R., 1995, Between Politics and Metaphysics, Reflections in the Wake of Gillian Rose, Modern Theology, 11, 3, 10.1111/j.1468-0025.1995.tb00050.x · DOI

Cited by

See all 31

Metadata

Authors
Hurrell, A.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Hurrell, Andrew
Venue
Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional
Publisher
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Published
2016
Volume
59
Issue
2
ISSN
0034-7329 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1590/0034-7329201600208
OpenAlex
W2554912832
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
Keywords
Eurocentrism, systemic analysis, global perspective

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards the Global Study of International Relations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1590/0034-7329201600208
The paper
Hurrell, A. (2016). Towards the Global Study of International Relations. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201600208