The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interoperability of financial management systems in local governments and opportunities for digital transformation
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Two digital transformation agendas have been implemented in parallel in Brazil, one for disseminating interoperable financial management systems and the other focused on services for citizens, called “digital government.” Although these agendas are interconnected, their joint impact is rarely discussed. This article addresses the adoption agenda for financial management systems in local governments and the potential implications for the digital government agenda. We analyzed the automation, interoperability, and integration of commercial software contracted by 150 municipalities based on the perception of accountants who use these systems. The results indicate a greater development of the core accounting module and less integration and interoperability with non-core modules of the government’s system. Based on a matrix of integration of financial management systems modules and interoperability with digital government systems, we analyzed different scenarios for the digital transformation of local governments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New Public Management Is Dead--Long Live Digital-Era Governance
Dunleavy, P. (2005) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mui057 · Cited by 2,638
Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002 · Cited by 1,990
The public value of E-Government – A literature review
Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001 · Cited by 1,141
E – Government for Developing Countries: Opportunities and Challenges
Ndou, V. (2004) · The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries · doi:10.1002/j.1681-4835.2004.tb00117.x · Cited by 1,097
Vergne, J., & Durand, R. (2009) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00913.x · Cited by 554
The Evolution and Continuing Challenges of E‐Governance
Dawes, S. S. (2008) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00981.x · Cited by 478
The potential impacts of digital technologies on co-production and co-creation
Lember, V., Brandsen, T., & Tõnurist, P. (2019) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1619807 · Cited by 437
Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government
Gottschalk, P. (2008) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2008.03.003 · Cited by 388
E-governance innovation: Barriers and strategies
Meijer, A. (2015) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.001 · Cited by 365
E-Government Integration and Interoperability: Framing the Research Agenda
Scholl, H. J. (., & Klischewski, R. (2007) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900690701402668 · Cited by 354
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Aquino A. C. B., 2022, Enraizamento de infraestruturas digitais de coleta de dados pelos Tribunais de Contas, Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 33, 46
- 2009, Decreto nº 7.185, de 27 de maio de 2010, Diário Oficial da União
- 2009, Lei Complementar nº 131, de 27 de maio de 2009, Diário Oficial da União
- 2012, Decreto nº 7.827, de 16 de outubro de 2012, Diário Oficial da União
- 2020, Decreto nº 10.540, de 5 de novembro de 2020, Diário Oficial da União
- 2021, Lei nº 14.129, de 29 de março de 2021, Diário Oficial da União
- 2023, Decreto nº 11.644, de 12 de julho de 2023, Diário Oficial da União
- Meijer A, 2015, 32, 198
- Santos L. O., 2024, Doublethink in governamental accounting: development of an RPA to identify inconsistencies in financial reporting, The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 24, 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Azevedo, R. R. D., Lino, A. F., Carrara, L. G. C., Aquino, A. C. B. D., & Cardoso, R. L.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- University of Essex (GB)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (BR)
- Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Revista de Administração Pública
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 2025
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0034-7612 (ISSN-L)
- 1982-3134
- OpenAlex
- W4412699981
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 14.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Revista de Administração Pública (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (406884-2021-8)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Fiscal Policies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Digital Transformation in Financial Services
- Keywords
- financial management system, interoperability, local government, digital transformation, e-government, software integration, accounting module, Brazil
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review