Cited by 0Plant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityAgriculture, Plant Science, Crop ManagementAgricultural Science and Fertilization

Sustainable bioformulation of Trichoderma asperellum, Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Bacillus subtilis enhances agricultural productivity in different Brazilian states

Open access
Bortolassi, Ana Claudia Canalli, Almeida, Anna Flávia Neri de, Meyer, Edenilson, Machado, Juliano Silveira, Romão, Thaynara Dutra, Nanque, Lazaro, Giachini, Admir José·2026·Ciência e Agrotecnologia

Abstract

ABSTRACT The use of plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPM) is a promising strategy to enhance crop productivity while improving soil functionality. This study evaluated the efficacy of fungal-bacterial consortium of Trichoderma asperellum, Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Bacillus subtilis, for promoting the growth of soybean and maize cultivated under distinct edaphoclimatic conditions across Brazil. Field trials were conducted in five locations within Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, São Paulo, and Minas Gerais. Treatments consisted of a fungal-bacterial consortium (200 g ha-¹, in-furrow at planting) combined with 50% or 100% of the recommended nitrogen rate. Shoot dry biomass, foliar nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations, grain yield, and soil microbial activity determined by fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis were assessed. The fungal-bacterial consortium significantly improved all variables in both crops. In soybean, shoot biomass increased by 10.7-13.4% and grain yield by 9.2-9.9%, while foliar N and P rose by 10.2-12.4%, and soil enzymatic activity increased up to 11.0%. In maize, biomass increased by 10.4-11.8% and grain yield by 13.1-13.9%, with foliar N and P increasing by 9.5-14.1% and soil enzymatic activity by up to 12.5%. Notably, positive responses were maintained under 50% nitrogen fertilization. These findings demonstrate that fungal-bacterial consortium enhances nutrient acquisition and soil microbial activity, improving crop performance under variable environmental conditions and reduced N input, supporting its potential as a biological tool for sustainable nutrient management in soybean and maize systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/1413-7054202650002826

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39

Authors
Bortolassi, A. C. C., Almeida, A. F. N. D., Meyer, E., Machado, J. S., Romão, T. D., Nanque, L., & Giachini, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina/UFSC, Brazil
  • Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR)
Venue
Ciência e Agrotecnologia
Published
2026
Volume
50
ISSN
  • 1413-7054 (ISSN-L)
  • 1981-1829
OpenAlex
W7203654750
Cited by
0
References
39
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ciência e Agrotecnologia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Keywords
plant growth-promoting microorganisms, Trichoderma asperellum, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Bacillus subtilis, soybean, maize, grain yield, soil microbial activity, nitrogen fertilizer reduction, sustainable nutrient management, biofertilizers, edaphoclimatic conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review