Cited by 23Digital Mental Health InterventionsPhysical Activity and HealthAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Web-based exercise interventions for patients with depressive and anxiety disorders: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Open access
Carneiro, Lara, Rosenbaum, Simon, Ward, Philip B., Clemente, Filipe M., Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo, Monteiro-Júnior, Renato S., Martins, Alexandre, Afonso, José·2022·Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The number of people suffering from depression and/or anxiety has increased steadily due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In this context, web-based exercise interventions have emerged as a potential treatment strategy. The objective of this study was to synthetize evidence from randomized controlled trials regarding the effects of web-based exercise interventions on patients with depressive and/or anxiety disorders. METHODS: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Six databases were searched (Cochrane Library, EBSCO, PubMed, SciELO, Scopus, and Web of Science), and eligible articles were identified according to a PICOS inclusion-exclusion approach (participants with depressive or anxiety disorders; web-based exercise interventions; active or passive control group; assessment of changes in depressive or anxiety disorders; randomized design). Primary outcomes were depressive and/or anxiety symptoms. The quality of evidence was assessed with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. RESULTS: Of 7,846 search results, three studies met the inclusion criteria (172 participants between 18 and 65 years of age, 95.9% women). The web-based exercise interventions lasted 8-12 weeks and involved endurance training, yoga, or combined endurance and strength training. The comparators involved non-exercise controls or active controls. Compliance rates were low. Web-based exercise interventions were not superior to controls regarding anxiety symptoms, and only one study found benefits for depressive symptoms (p ≤ 0.05). The quality of the cumulative evidence was low. CONCLUSION: The available data regarding the effects of web-based exercise interventions on depression and/or anxiety symptoms is scarce, the risk of bias is high, and the quality of the cumulative results is low. Currently, no clear recommendations can be provided. REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42021225938.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/1516-4446-2021-2026

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 79 · Cited by 23

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [14]Herring MP Chapter 2 – Exercise for the management of anxiety and stress-related disorders Stubbs B Rosenbaum S Exercise-based interventions for mental illness Cambridge Academic Press 2018 19 52
  2. [28]ACSM ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 11th ed Kowloon Wolters Kluwer 2021
  3. [37]Higgins JP Thomas J Chandler J Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2nd ed Chichester John Wiley & Sons 2019
  4. [39]American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) Arlington American Psychiatric Publishing 2013

Authors
Carneiro, L., Rosenbaum, S., Ward, P. B., Clemente, F. M., Ramirez-Campillo, R., Monteiro-Júnior, R. S., Martins, A., & Afonso, J.
Affiliations
  • Centro de Investigação em Desporto Saúde e Desenvolvimento Humano (PT)
  • Black Dog Institute (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Universidade Politécnica de Viana do Castelo (PT)
  • Departamento de Ciencias de la Actividad Física, Chile; Centro de Investigación en Fisiología del Ejercicio, Facultad de Ciencias, Chile
  • Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros (BR)
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
Corresponding author
Clemente, Filipe M.
Venue
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2022-06
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
331-341
ISSN
  • 1516-4446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1809-452X
OpenAlex
W3217463357
Cited by
23
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
depression, anxiety disorders, exercise therapy, yoga, endurance training, resistance training, COVID-19 pandemic, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, medication adherence
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Quality of Life, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Internet, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review