The role of mindful eating, and intuitive eating on the relationship with orthorexia nervosa in University Students: a cross-sectional study
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT Objective The study aimed to determine the relationship between mindful eating, intuitive eating, eating attitudes, and orthorexia nervosa in university students. Methods In the current cross-sectional study, 320 students (59.4% female) were enrolled. An online questionnaire including demographic characteristics, Orthorexia Nervosa Questionnaire-11, Eating Attitudes Test-40, Intuitive Eating Scale–2nd edition, and Mindful Eating Questionnaire was performed. Additionally, some anthropometric measurements (body weight, height, waist, and hip circumferences) were taken with the participants’ declaration. Data were analyzed using IBM®SPSSNo-Break®No-Break 24.0. Results In participants with orthorexia nervosa , the scores of “eating discipline” and “interference” scores, which are Mindful Eating Questionnaire sub-factors, were higher than those who do not have orthorexia nervosa (p<0.05). There was a negative correlation between Mindful Eating Questionnaire and Orthorexia Nervosa Questionnaire-11 scores (r = –0.137; p:0.014). Additionally, the one-point increase in the Orthorexia Nervosa Questionnaire-11 scores of participants led to a 0.101 increase in Eating Attitudes Test-40 scores (B: 0.101, SE: 0.024, p<0.001), and a 1.667 decrease in Mindful Eating Questionnaire scores (B: -1.667, SE: 0.667, p:0.014). The body mass index, Eating Attitudes Test-40, and Mindful Eating Questionnaire scores affected Orthorexia Nervosa Questionnaire-11 scores by 6.3% (R2: 0.063). Conclusions Our study demonstrated a negative correlation between the Orthorexia Nervosa Questionnaire-11 and Mindful Eating Questionnaire total scores, whereas no correlation was found between Orthorexia Nervosa Questionnaire-11 and Intuitive Eating Scale–2nd edition scores. However, further research is needed to classify orthorexia nervosa as a separate eating disorder and to establish criteria for diagnosis and treatment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both mindful and intuitive eating are inversely associated with BMI and psychological distress [27-29].
“Furthermore, both mindful and intuitive eating are inversely associated with body mass index (BMI) and psychological distress, supporting their role in promoting mental and physical health [27-29].”
From Four Facet Mindful Eating and Eating Disorder Risk: Mediation By Depression and Body Mass Index. (2026) · cites this paper as [27]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 38 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- Bayram, H. M.
- Affiliations
- Istanbul Gelisim University, Turkey
- ORCID
- Bayram, Hatice Merve
- Venue
- Revista de Nutrição
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 37
- ISSN
- 1415-5273 (ISSN-L)
- 1678-9865
- OpenAlex
- W4403134531
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5
- FWCI
- 2.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Revista de Nutrição (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
- Keywords
- orthorexia nervosa, mindful eating, intuitive eating, eating attitudes, university students, eating disorders, body mass index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review