Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 325

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dental ceramics: a review of new materials and processing methods

Open access
SILVA, Lucas Hian da, LIMA, Erick de, MIRANDA, Ranulfo Benedito de Paula, FAVERO, Stéphanie Soares, LOHBAUER, Ulrich, CESAR, Paulo Francisco·2017·Brazilian Oral Research

Abstract

The evolution of computerized systems for the production of dental restorations associated to the development of novel microstructures for ceramic materials has caused an important change in the clinical workflow for dentists and technicians, as well as in the treatment options offered to patients. New microstructures have also been developed by the industry in order to offer ceramic and composite materials with optimized properties, i.e., good mechanical properties, appropriate wear behavior and acceptable aesthetic characteristics. The objective of this literature review is to discuss the main advantages and disadvantages of the new ceramic systems and processing methods. The manuscript is divided in five parts: I) monolithic zirconia restorations; II) multilayered dental prostheses; III) new glass-ceramics; IV) polymer infiltrated ceramics; and V) novel processing technologies. Dental ceramics and processing technologies have evolved significantly in the past ten years, with most of the evolution being related to new microstructures and CAD-CAM methods. In addition, a trend towards the use of monolithic restorations has changed the way clinicians produce all-ceramic dental prostheses, since the more aesthetic multilayered restorations unfortunately are more prone to chipping or delamination. Composite materials processed via CAD-CAM have become an interesting option, as they have intermediate properties between ceramics and polymers and are more easily milled and polished.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0058

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 325

Metadata

Authors
SILVA, L. H. D., LIMA, E. D., MIRANDA, R. B. D. P., FAVERO, S. S., LOHBAUER, U., & CESAR, P. F.
Venue
Brazilian Oral Research
Published
2017-08-28
Volume
31
Issue
suppl 1
Pages
e58-e58
ISSN
  • 1517-7491 (ISSN-L)
  • 1806-8324
OpenAlex
W2747377245
Cited by
325
References
35
FWCI
34.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dental ceramics: a review of new materials and processing methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0058
The paper
SILVA, L. H. D., LIMA, E. D., MIRANDA, R. B. D. P., FAVERO, S. S., LOHBAUER, U., & CESAR, P. F. (2017). Dental ceramics: a review of new materials and processing methods. Brazilian Oral Research. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0058

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.