Cited by 7Interprofessional Education and CollaborationHealth and Medical EducationHealth, Nursing, Elderly Care

Práticas colaborativas nas urgências em Saúde: a interprofissionalidade do Programa PermanecerSUS, Secretaria Estadual de Saúde da Bahia, Brasil

Open access
Figueredo, Wilton Nascimento, Veras, Renata Meira, Silva, Gilberto Tadeu Reis da, Cardoso, Gustavo Marques Porto·2018·Interface - Comunicação, Saúde, Educação

Abstract

Este artigo apresenta e discute o Programa PermanecerSUS como uma proposta de educação interprofissional (EIP) à formação em Saúde. Possui abordagem qualitativa, sob a perspectiva da Etnografia Institucional (EI). A discussão se respalda no conteúdo registrado no diário de campo construído pelo pesquisador-etnógrafo durante a observação participante em duas unidades de urgência hospitalar, na cidade de Salvador, Bahia, Brasil. Os resultados sugerem que o programa desenvolve competências como o trabalho em equipe, a intercomunicação e a solução de problemas em conjunto entre os estudantes; e proporciona integração educação e trabalho. Entretanto, os desafios do PermanecerSUS estão pautados em proporcionar melhorias na relação comunicacional entre os estagiários e profissionais do serviço e investir na formação dos preceptores do estágio, com perspectivas de mudanças das práticas e impactos à qualidade da assistência nos serviços de saúde.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/1807-57622017.0678

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 7

Authors
Figueredo, W. N., Veras, R. M., Silva, G. T. R. D., & Cardoso, G. M. P.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR)
  • Universidade Federal da Bahia, Brasil
  • Faculdade Nobre, Brasil
Venue
Interface - Comunicação, Saúde, Educação
Published
2018-07-10
Volume
22
Issue
suppl 2
Pages
1697-1704
ISSN
  • 1414-3283 (ISSN-L)
  • 1807-5762
OpenAlex
W2873904955
Cited by
7
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
pt
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Interface - Comunicação Saúde Educação (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Nursing, Elderly Care
Keywords
interprofessional education, interprofessional collaboration, emergency department, clinical internship, preceptor training, teamwork, interprofessional communication, health professions education, Bahia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review