The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of forest fragmentation on amazonian understory bird communities
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARYData form an intensive mist-netting mark-recapture program in the central Amazon demostrate significant changes in the undesrtory avian community in isolate patches of 1 and 10 ha of terra firme forest. Following isolation, capture rates increase significantly as birds fleeing the felled forest entered the. newly formed forest fragments. Movement to and from the reserve is restricted, as witnessed by an increase in recapture percentages following isolation. Species of birds that axe. obligate army ant followers disappeared at the time the surrounding habitat was removed from 1 - and 10 - ha areas. The complex mixed-species insectivorous flocks typical of Amazonian forests deteriorated within 2 years of isolation of 1 - and 10 - ha forest fragments. Several species of mid-story insectivores changed their foraging behavior after isolation of small forest reserves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preservation of Natural Diversity: The Problem of Extinction Prone Species
Terborgh, J. (1974) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1297090 · Cited by 474
Structure of Avian Communities in Selected Panama and Illinois Habitats
Karr, J. R. (1971) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942366 · Cited by 363
Multi-Species Territoriality in Neotropical Foraging Flocks
Munn, C. A., & Terborgh, J. (1979) · Ornithological Applications · doi:10.2307/1366956 · Cited by 263
Sociobiology and Adaptive Significance of Interspecific Foraging Flocks in the Neotropics
Powell, G. V. N. (1985) · Ornithological Monographs · doi:10.2307/40168313 · Cited by 218
Avian Extinction on Barro Colorado Island, Panama: A Reassessment
Karr, J. R. (1982) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283904 · Cited by 194
Benign neglect: A model of faunal collapse in the game reserves of East Africa
Soulé, M. E., Wilcox, B. A., & Holtby, C. (1979) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(79)90047-8 · Cited by 182
The Behavior of Bicolored Antbirds
Johnston, D. W., & Willis, E. O. ́. (1967) · Bird-Banding · doi:10.2307/4511425 · Cited by 135
The Minimum Critical Size of Ecosystems
Lovejoy, T. Ε., & Oren, D. C. (1981) · Ecological studies · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5936-7_2 · Cited by 62
Self-citationThe persistence of ant-following birds in small amazonian forest fragments
Harper, L. H. (1989) · Acta Amazonica · doi:10.1590/1809-43921989191263 · Cited by 57
Cited by
Ecosystem Decay of Amazonian Forest Fragments: a 22‐Year Investigation
Laurance, W. F., Lovejoy, T. E., Vasconcelos, H. L., Bruna, E. M., Didham, R. K., Stouffer, P. C., Gascon, C., Bierregaard, R. O., Laurance, S. G., & Sampaio, E. (2002) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01025.x · Cited by 1,847
Self-citationCastelletta, M., Sodhi, N. S., & Subaraj, R. (2000) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2000.99285.x · Cited by 145
SIGEL, B. J., SHERRY, T. W., & YOUNG, B. E. (2006) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00293.x · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Bierregaard Jr, R. O., & Lovejoy, T. Ε.
- Venue
- Acta Amazonica
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 1989
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 0
- Pages
- 215-241
- ISSN
- 0044-5967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2494978988
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 1.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of forest fragmentation on amazonian understory bird communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1590/1809-43921989191241
- The paper
- Bierregaard Jr, R. O., & Lovejoy, T. Ε. (1989). Effects of forest fragmentation on amazonian understory bird communities. Acta Amazonica. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-43921989191241
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
