Cited by 79Fish biology, ecology, and behaviorFish Ecology and Management StudiesFish Biology and Ecology Studies

As Macrófitas aquáticas como berçário para a Ictiofauna da Várzea do Rio Amazonas

Open access
SÁNCHEZ-BOTERO, Jorge Iván, ARAÚJO-LIMA, Carlos A. R. M.·2001·Acta Amazonica

Abstract

O presente estudo descreve a estrutura de tamanho e maturidade sexual das espécies de peixes que vivem associadas às raízes de macrófitas aquáticas durante o período de cheia. Foi o objetivo do trabalho demonstrar que este habitat funciona como um berçário e que a maior parte da sua fauna é composta por indivíduos jovens. Foram coletados 3910 indivíduos de 91 espécies de peixes, em quatro tipos de macrófitas aquáticas (Paspalum repens, Echynochloa polystachya, Eichhornia spp. e "mistura de capins em decomposição") em três lagos de várzea da Amazônia Central (Camaleão, Rei e Janauacá). A ictiofauna foi composta predominantemente por indivíduos menores que 7 cm. Indivíduos jovens formaram a maioria da assembléia (87%). Quarenta e uma espécies são explotadas pela frota pesqueira da região. Conclui-se que este habitat é um berçário importante e que deve ser conservado para manter o potencial dos recursos pesqueiros da Amazônia Central.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/1809-43922001313447

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Temperature, dissolved oxygen, water depth, and other environmental factors are significantly associated with fish species distributions in floating meadows.

    “Temperature, dissolved oxygen, water depth, and other environmental factors are significantly associated with fish species distributions in floating meadows (Junk et al., 1983; Sánchez‐Botero et al., 2001; Tejerina‐Garro et al., 1998).”

    From Threshold responses of floating meadow fish communities to floodplain forest cover in the lower Amazon River (2025) · cites this paper as Sánchez‐Botero et al., 2001

    The Discussion (page unavailable) suggests that dissolved oxygen varies with depth beneath aquatic macrophytes and may influence the vertical distribution of fish. It says there are no direct observations of that vertical distribution, however, and does not establish a statistically significant association. The passages do not support the claim about temperature or other environmental factors. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These z+ periodic strategists were mainly small-bodied species, such as Brachyhypopomus spp., Bryconops spp., and Cy. spiluropsis, that are associated with floating meadows during all life stages.

    “These were mainly small‐bodied species, such as Brachyhypopomus spp. (Mago‐Leccia, 1994), Bryconops spp. (Kner, 1858), and Cy. spiluropsis, that are associated with floating meadows during all life stages (Lima et al., 2003; Sánchez‐Botero et al., 2001; Zuanon & Ferreira, 2008; Zuanon et al., 2004).”

    From Threshold responses of floating meadow fish communities to floodplain forest cover in the lower Amazon River (2025) · cites this paper as Sánchez‐Botero et al., 2001

    The species table in the indexed copy (labeled Introduction; page unavailable) lists Brachyhypopomus species and Cyphocharax sp. among fish sampled with macrophytes, and the Discussion says most sampled fish were small. But the paper does not identify Bryconops spp. or Cyphocharax spiluropsis, classify these fish as periodic strategists, or establish an association throughout all life stages. Instead, it reports that 87% of sampled individuals were juveniles and notes that its conclusions are best restricted to daytime sampling. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Floating macrophyte beds (floating meadows) in Amazon floodplains support high fish diversity and serve as nursery habitat for many fishes of high commercial importance.

    “Floating macrophyte beds, known as floating meadows, in Amazon floodplains support high fish diversity and serve as nursery habitat for many fishes of high commercial importance.”
  • Juveniles of these species use floating meadows as nurseries, and adults directly ingest aquatic macrophytes.

    “Juveniles of these species use floating meadows as nurseries (Sánchez‐Botero et al., 2001), and adults directly ingest aquatic macrophytes (Arantes, Winemiller, Petrere, et al., 2019; Zuanon & Ferreira, 2008).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Araújo-Lima, C.A.R.M.; Portugal, L.P.S.; Ferreira, E.G. 1986. Fish-macrophyte re lationship in Anavilhanas Archipelago, a black water system in the Central Amazon. Journal of Fish Biology,29:1 -11.
  2. Araújo-Lima, C. A. R. M. & Goulding, M. 1997. So fruitful a fish: ecology, conser vation and aquaculture of the Amazon's tambaqui. Columbia University Press. New York. 191 p.
  3. Beverton, R.J.H. 1992. Patterns of reproduc tive strategy parameters in some marine teleost fishes. Journal of fish Biology, 41 (Supplement B): 137-160.
  4. Crampton, W.G.R. 1998. Effects of anoxia on the distribution, respiratory strategies and electric signal diversity of gimnotiform fishes. Journal of Fish Biology, 53: 307- 331.
  5. Froese, R.; Binohlan, C. 2000. Empirical re lationship to estimate asymptotic length, length at first maturity and length at maxi mum yield per recruit in fishes, with a simple method to evaluate length fre quency data. Journal of Fish Biol- ogy,56:758-773.
  6. Goulding, M. 1980. The fish and the forest. University of California Press. Los Ange les. 200 p.
  7. Hatzenbeler, G. R.; Bozek, Μ. Α.; Jennings, M. J.; Emmons, Ε. E. 2000. Seasonal varia tion in fish assemblage structure and habi tat structurein nearshore littoral zone of Wiscosin lakes. North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 20:360-368.
  8. Henderson, P.A.; Crampton, W.G.R. 1997. A comparison of fish diversity and abun dance between nutrient-rich and nutrient- poor lakes in the Upper Amazon. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 13:173-198.
  9. Junk, W. J.; Piedade, Μ. Τ. F. 1997. Plant life in the floodplain with special reference to the herbaceus plants. In: Junk, W. J (Eds). The Central Amazon Floodplain. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 147-181.
  10. Melack, J. M.; Forsberg, B. R. 2001. Bio- geochemistry of Amazon floodplain lakes and associated wetlands. In: McClain, M.E., Victoria, R.L. & Richey, J.E. (Eds). The Biogeochemistry of The Amazon. Lim nology and landscape ecology of a mighthy river and its basin Basin and its Role in a Changing World. Oxford Uni versity Press, Oxford, p.25-50.
  11. Santos, G.M. 1980. Estudos da reprodução e hábitos reprodutivos de Schizodon fasciatus 1829; Rhytiodus microlepis Kner, 1959 e R. argenteofuscus Kner, 1859 (Characoidei) do lago Janauaçá, AM. Acta Amazônica, 10 (3): 635-649.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SÁNCHEZ-BOTERO, J. I., & ARAÚJO-LIMA, C. A. R. M.
Affiliations
  • Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (BR)
  • INPA, Brazil
Venue
Acta Amazonica
Published
2001-09
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
437-437
ISSN
0044-5967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2467383121
Cited by
79
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
pt
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Acta Amazonica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
aquatic macrophytes, fish nursery habitat, ichthyofauna, size structure, sexual maturity, juvenile fish, floodplain lakes, várzea, Paspalum repens, Eichhornia, fish assemblages, fisheries exploitation, fisheries conservation, Central Amazon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review