Cited by 82Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife EducationWildlife Ecology and ConservationConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

One Conservation: the integrated view of biodiversity conservation

Open access
Pizzutto, Cristiane Schilbach, Colbachini, Helen, Jorge-Neto, Pedro Nacib·2021·Animal Reproduction

Abstract

The current global situation requires urgent decision-making to reverse processes of mass extinction of thousands of species. As a way of showing the importance of joint actions in this process, we aim to present the concept of One Conservation as a new proposal for the integration of sustainability, in situ and ex situ conservation for the restoration of ecosystems. According to the United Nations, we are beginning the decade of ecosystem restoration and in association with the International Union for Conservation of Nature guidelines, we can join efforts in the conservation of the planet. The survival of many species of wild animals depends on the management of populations currently maintained in ex situ conditions (under human care). To facilitate the exchange of genetic material between in situ and ex situ populations, reproductive biotechniques have become a great tool, making it possible to restore species in their natural environments. For effective conservation to occur, there must be an integrated view of the problem as a whole, and action for solutions must take place jointly by different spheres of society. Even more, conservation must be carried out by the public sector, the private sector, the third sector, and not less importantly, the agricultural sector. Therefore, One Conservation is defined as an interconnection between ex situ and in situ conservation plans, anthropic actions in the environment, and research in different areas that encompass conservation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/1984-3143-ar2021-0024

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The One Plan Approach and One Conservation emphasise improving all aspects of managing populations, including developing new technologies that safeguard animal wellbeing in the wild and human care while maintaining genetically healthy populations.

    “These approaches emphasise improving all aspects of managing populations, including developing new technologies that safeguard animal wellbeing in the wild and human care while maintaining genetically healthy populations.”

    From The Concept of Agency, Animal Wellbeing, and the Practical Realities of Ex Situ Breeding Programs in Zoos and Aquariums (2024) · cites this paper as [94]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The need for integration between ex situ and in situ population management and the expansion of technologies through research is highlighted by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature's One Plan Approach and further through the lens of One Conservation.

    “The need for integration between ex situ and in situ population management and the expansion of technologies through research is highlighted by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature's (IUCN) One Plan Approach (OPA), and further through the lens of One Conservation [94].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Araujo GR, 2020, Field friendly method for wild feline semen cryopreservation, J Threat Taxa, 12, 15557, 10.11609/jott.5744.12.5.15557-15564 · DOI
  2. Baldassarre H, 2015, Efficient recovery of oocytes from ‘'onça parda” (Puma Concolor) by laparoscopic ovum pick-up of gonadotropin-stimulated females, Anim Reprod, 12, 717
  3. Campos LB, 2019, Advances and challenges of using ovarian preantral follicles to develop biobanks of wild mammals, Biopreserv Biobank, 17, 334, 10.1089/bio.2018.0130 · DOI
  4. Campos LB, 2019, Vitrification of collared peccary ovarian tissue using open or closed systems and different intracellular cryoprotectants, Cryobiology, 91, 77, 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2019.10.193 · DOI
  5. Cardoso CA, 2020, Somatic feather follicle cell culture of the gallus domesticus species for creating a wild bird genetic resource bank, Anim Reprod, 17, 10.1590/1984-3143-ar2020-0044 · DOI
  6. Carelli JB, 2017, In vitro fertilization of puma (Puma concolor) from vitrified oocytes and semen collected from epididymis of dead donor : case report., Rev Bras Reprodução Anim., 41, 364
  7. Comizzoli P, 2017, Biobanking and fertility preservation for rare and endangered species, Anim Reprod, 14, 30, 10.21451/1984-3143-AR889 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Frankham R, 2014, Genetics in conservation management: revised recommendations for the 50/500 rules, Red List criteria and population viability analyses, Biol Conserv, 170, 56, 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.036 · DOI
  9. Gabora L, 2011, The evolution of intelligence., 328
  10. García-Dorado A, 2015, On the consequences of ignoring purging on genetic recommendations for minimum viable population rules, Heredity, 115, 185, 10.1038/hdy.2015.28 · DOI
  11. Keller L, 2002, Inbreeding effects in wild populations, Trends Ecol Evol, 17, 230, 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02489-8 · DOI
  12. Machado LC, 2016, Maintenance of Brazilian Biodiversity by germplasm bank, Pesq Vet Bras, 36, 62, 10.1590/S0100-736X2016000100010 · DOI
  13. Machado LC, 2017, Female reproductive system morphology of crab-eating fox (Cerdocyon thous) and cryopreservation of genetic material for animal germplasm bank enrichment, Anat Histol Embryol, 46, 539, 10.1111/ahe.12306 · DOI
  14. Pinillos RG, 2015, One Welfare, Vet Rec, 177, 629, 10.1136/vr.h6830 · DOI
  15. Pizzutto CS, 2020, Avanços na promoção do bem-estar animal nos zoológicos e aquários do Brasil., 138
  16. Praxedes ÉA, 2018, Use of somatic cell banks in the conservation of wild felids, Zoo Biol, 37, 258, 10.1002/zoo.21416 · DOI
  17. Praxedes ÉCG, 2018, Reproduction in agouti (Dasyprocta spp.): A review of reproductive physiology for developing assisted reproductive techniques, Anim Reprod, 15, 1181, 10.21451/1984-3143-AR2018-0058 · DOI
  18. Reed DH, 2003, Estimates of minimum viable population sizes for vertebrates and factors influencing those estimates, Biol Conserv, 113, 23, 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00346-4 · DOI
  19. Santos MDCB, 2021, Evaluation of different skin regions derived from a postmortem jaguar, Panthera onca (Linnaeus, 1758), after vitrification for development of cryobanks from captive animals, Zoo Biol, 10.1002/zoo.21605 · DOI
  20. Shaffer ML, 1981, Minimum population sizes for species conservation, Bioscience, 31, 131, 10.2307/1308256 · DOI
  21. Shaffer ML, 1990, Population viability analysis, Conserv Biol, 4, 39, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00265.x · DOI
  22. Silva HVR, 2019, Semen cryopreservation and banking for the conservation of neotropical carnivores, Biopreserv Biobank, 17, 183, 10.1089/bio.2018.0104 · DOI
  23. Silva MCC, 2019, Pharmacological semen collection and cryopreservation of the Giant Anteater (Myrmecophaga tridactyla) in the wild, Rev Bras Reprodução Anim, 43, 705
  24. Silva AMD, 2020, Cryopreservation and culture of testicular tissues: an essential tool for biodiversity preservation, Biopreserv Biobank, 18, 235, 10.1089/bio.2020.0010 · DOI
  25. Silva HVR, 2020, Influence of different extenders on morphological and functional parameters of frozen-thawed spermatozoa of jaguar (Panthera onca), Cryobiology, 92, 53, 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2019.10.195 · DOI
  26. Waltham NJ, 2020, UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration 2021-2030: what chance for success in restoring coastal ecosystems?, Front Mar Sci, 2020, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pizzutto, C. S., Colbachini, H., & Jorge-Neto, P. N.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Aquário de São Paulo, Brasil
  • Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil; Instituto Reprocon, Brasil
Corresponding author
Colbachini, Helen
Venue
Animal Reproduction
Published
2021
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
e20210024-e20210024
ISSN
  • 1806-9614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1984-3143
OpenAlex
W3168599055
Cited by
82
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animal Reproduction (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Keywords
biodiversity conservation, in situ conservation, ex situ conservation, ecological restoration, species restoration, reproductive biotechnology, mass extinction, integrated conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review