In vitro microscopic evaluation of metal- and zirconium-oxide-based crowns’ marginal fit
Open accessAbstract
Objective To evaluate the marginal adaptation of computer-aided designing and computer-aided machining (CAD/CAM) fabricated cobalt-chromium and zirconium-oxide-based ceramic crowns compared to those produced by a conventional method. Material and Methods The study consists of three groups; 45 crowns fabricated from cobalt-chromium (CAD-CoCr) and 45 crowns manufactured from zirconium CAD/CAM technology (CAD-Z), and 45 control (C) which consists of conventional metal-ceramic crowns. The marginal discrepancies in vertical dimensions were assessed utilizing a microscope in four surfaces (mesial, distal, vestibular, and oral) for each crown. On completion of the microscopic evaluation, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to study the difference in the four surfaces, considered altogether. Two-way ANOVA revealed the effect of three systems used for gap measurements of each landmark. The differences observed were considered significant at p<0.05. Results There were no differences in the four surfaces revealed by АNOVА in the three groups when considered altogether. Two-way ANOVA of each surface discovered no differences among all groups as well. Conclusion The CAD/CAM crowns revealed a comparable and satisfactory marginal adaptation compared to conventional metal-ceramic crowns.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Metal-ceramic restorations fabricated by the conventional method have a lower marginal fit compared to zirconia restorations fabricated by the CAD/CAM method.
“this type of restoration fabricated by the conventional method has a lower marginal fit compared to zirconia restorations fabricated by the computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) method”
From Potential Impact of Prosthetic Biomaterials on the Periodontium: A Comprehensive Review (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 15
- Authors
- Heboyan, A., Marya, A., Syed, A. U. Y., Khurshid, Z., Zafar, M. S., Rokaya, D., & Anastasyan, M.
- Affiliations
- Yerevan State Medical University (AM)
- University of Puthisastra (KH)
- University of Science and Technology of Fujairah (AE)
- King Faisal University (SA)
- Riphah International University (PK)
- Walailak University (TH)
- Art Classic Dent Dental Centre, Armenia
- ORCID
- Venue
- Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 22
- ISSN
- 1519-0501 (ISSN-L)
- 1983-4632
- OpenAlex
- W4226256283
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 3.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
- Keywords
- marginal adaptation, dental crowns, CAD/CAM crowns, zirconia crowns, metal-ceramic crowns, marginal gap, microscopic examination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review