Aborto e legislação: opinião de magistrados e promotores de justiça brasileiros
Open accessAbstract
OBJETIVO: Analisar opiniões de juízes e promotores de justiça sobre a legislação brasileira e as circunstâncias em que o aborto induzido deveria ser permitido. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal realizado com 1.493 juízes e 2.614 promotores no Brasil entre 2005 e 2006. Os participantes preencheram um questionário estruturado sobre características sociodemográficas, opiniões acerca da legislação que trata do aborto e circunstâncias para permiti-lo. Realizaram-se análises bivariada e multivariada por regressão de Poisson. RESULTADOS: A maioria (78%) dos participantes opinou que as circunstâncias nas quais não se pune o aborto deveriam ser ampliadas, ou mesmo que o aborto não deveria ser considerado crime. As maiores proporções de opiniões favoráveis a que o aborto seja permitido referiram-se a risco para a vida da gestante (84%), anencefalia (83%), malformação congênita grave (82%) e gravidez resultante de estupro (82%). As variáveis relativas à religião foram as mais freqüentemente associadas a essas opiniões. CONCLUSÕES: Observou-se uma tendência a considerar a necessidade de mudanças na atual legislação brasileira no sentido de ampliar as circunstâncias nas quais não se pune o aborto e até deixar de considerá-lo como um crime, independentemente da circunstância em que é praticado.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
28% of those contacted completed the survey, a participation percentage higher than in other studies using a similar methodology.
“However, 28% of those contacted completed the survey, a participation percentage higher than in other studies using a similar methodology.31,32”
From A preliminary survey on the religious profile of Brazilian psychiatrists and their approach to patients' religiosity in clinical practice (2016) · cites this paper as [32]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 13
- Authors
- Duarte, G. A., Osis, M. J. D., Faúndes, A., & Sousa, M. H. D.
- Affiliations
- Centro de Pesquisa em Saúde Reprodutiva de Campinas, Brasil
- Venue
- Revista de Saúde Pública
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 406-420
- ISSN
- 0034-8910 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1487672841
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- pt
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Revista de Saúde Pública (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Keywords
- abortion law, legal opinions, decriminalization of abortion, anencephaly, congenital malformations
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Induced, Adult, Brazil, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Public Opinion, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors, Poisson Distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review