Cited by 63Malaria Research and ControlDiptera species taxonomy and behaviorMosquito-borne diseases and control

The distribution of two major malaria vectors, Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis, in Nigeria

Open access
Onyabe, David Y, Conn, Jan E·2001·Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz

Abstract

The distribution of Anopheles gambiae and An. arabiensis across the ecological zones of Nigeria (arid savanna in the north gradually turns into humid forest in the south) was investigated. Results of the present study were compared to the distributions determined from samples of indoor-resting females reported by an earlier study over 20 years ago. Larvae were sampled in the rainy seasons of 1997 and 1999 from 24 localities, 10 of which were sampled in both years. Specimens were identified by the polymerase chain reaction method. Results showed that species composition changed significantly among the 10 localities in both years (chi2=13.62, P = 0.0002), but this change was significant in only four of the 10 localities. The identity of the prevalent (more abundant) species changed between 1997 and 1999 in only three of 10 localities. An. arabiensis was prevalent in several localities in the southern Guinea savanna, an area where it was virtually absent over 20 years ago. The data suggest that An. arabiensis has extend its range, although differences in sampling technique (larval sampling versus adult collection) can not be ruled out as a possible explanation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s0074-02762001000800009

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Onyabe, D. Y., & Conn, J. E.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Venue
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
Published
2001-11
Volume
96
Issue
8
Pages
1081-1084
ISSN
0074-0276 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028764621
Cited by
63
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29ai040116-05)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI-40116)
  • Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Diptera species taxonomy and behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
Keywords
Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles arabiensis, malaria vectors, vector distribution, range expansion, ecoregions, Guinea savanna, larval sampling, species composition, Nigeria
MeSH terms
Animals, Anopheles, Demography, DNA, Female, Insect Vectors, Male, Nigeria, Chi-Square Distribution, Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review