The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reference values for lung function tests: II. Maximal respiratory pressures and voluntary ventilation
Open accessAbstract
The strength of the respiratory muscles can be evaluated from static measurements (maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures, MIP and MEP) or inferred from dynamic maneuvers (maximal voluntary ventilation, MVV). Although these data could be suitable for a number of clinical and research applications, no previous studies have provided reference values for such tests using a healthy, randomly selected sample of the adult Brazilian population. With this main purpose, we prospectively evaluated 100 non-smoking subjects (50 males and 50 females), 20 to 80 years old, selected from more than 8,000 individuals. Gender-specific linear prediction equations for MIP, MEP and MVV were developed by multiple regression analysis: age and, secondarily, anthropometric measurements explained up to 56% of the variability of the dependent variables. The most cited previous studies using either Caucasian or non-Caucasian samples systematically underestimated the observed values of MIP (P < 0.05). Interestingly, the self-reported level of regular physical activity and maximum aerobic power correlates strongly with both respiratory and peripheral muscular strength (knee extensor peak torque) (P < 0.01). Our results, therefore, provide a new frame of reference to evaluate the normalcy of some useful indexes of respiratory muscle strength in Brazilian males and females aged 20 to 80.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Inspiratory Muscle Training in Patients With Heart Failure and Inspiratory Muscle Weakness
Dall’Ago, P., Chiappa, G. R. S., Guths, H., Stein, R., & Ribeiro, J. P. (2006) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.052 · Cited by 429
Chest wall volumes during inspiratory loaded breathing in COPD patients
Coutinho Myrrha, M. A., Vieira, D. S. R., Moraes, K. S., Lage, S. M., Parreira, V. F., & Britto, R. R. (2013) · Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.resp.2013.04.017 · Cited by 30
Chest wall volume and asynchrony in stroke and Parkinson’s disease subjects: A case-control study
Florêncio, R. B., da Nobrega, A. J. S., Lima, Í. N. D. F., Gualdi, L. P., Cabral, E. E., Fagundes, M. L. L. C., Aliverti, A., Resqueti, V. R., & Fregonezi, G. A. D. F. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216641 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Neder, J. A., Andreoni, S., Lerario, M. C., & Nery, L. E.
- Venue
- Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 719-727
- ISSN
- 0100-879X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109200822
- Cited by
- 1,072
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reference values for lung function tests: II. Maximal respiratory pressures and voluntary ventilation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1590/s0100-879x1999000600007
- The paper
- Neder, J. A., Andreoni, S., Lerario, M. C., & Nery, L. E. (1999). Reference values for lung function tests: II. Maximal respiratory pressures and voluntary ventilation. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-879x1999000600007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.