Cited by 68Nutrition and Health in AgingBody Composition Measurement TechniquesMuscle Physiology and Disorders

Identification of sarcopenic obesity in postmenopausal women: a cutoff proposal

Open access
Oliveira, R.J., Bottaro, M., Júnior, J.T., Farinatti, P.T.V., Bezerra, L.A., Lima, R.M.·2011·Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research

Abstract

Sarcopenic obesity is the combination of reduced fat-free mass (FFM) and increased fat mass (FM) with advancing age but there is lack of clear criteria for its identification. The purposes of the present investigation were: 1) to determine the prevalence of postmenopausal women with reduced FFM relative to their FM and height, and 2) to examine whether there are associations between the proposed classification and health-related variables. A total of 607 women were included in this cross-sectional study and were separated into two subsets: 258 older women with a mean age of 66.8 ± 5.6 years and 349 young women aged 18-40 years (mean age, 29.0 ± 7.5 years). All volunteers underwent body composition assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The FFM index relative to FM and height was calculated and the cutoff value corresponded to two standard deviations below the mean of the young reference group. To examine the clinical significance of the classification, all older participants underwent measurements of quadriceps strength and cardiorespiratory fitness. Values were compared between those who were classified as low FFM or not, using an independent samples t-test and correlations were examined. The cutoff corresponded to a residual of -3.4 and generated a sarcopenic obesity prevalence of 19.8% that was associated with reduced muscle strength and aerobic fitness among the older participants. Also, the index correlated significantly with the health-related fitness variables. The results demonstrated reduced functional capacity for those below the proposed cutoff and suggested applicability of the approach as a definition for sarcopenic obesity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s0100-879x2011007500135

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Three studies defined sarcopenic obesity using the population distribution of residuals from linear regression models predicting appendicular fat-free mass from height and fat mass.

    “Less frequently (only 3 studies [50,81,99]) sarcopenic obesity was defined by calculating the population distribution of the residuals of linear regression models applied to predict appendicular fat-free mass (AFFM) using independent variables such as height (in meters) and fat-mass (FM) (in kg).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 68

Authors
Oliveira, R. J., Bottaro, M., Júnior, J. T., Farinatti, P. T. V., Bezerra, L. A., & Lima, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de Brasília (BR)
  • Universidade Católica de Brasília (BR)
  • Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
  • Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasil
Venue
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
Published
2011-11
Volume
44
Issue
11
Pages
1171-1176
ISSN
0100-879X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133196083
Cited by
68
References
29
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
sarcopenic obesity, postmenopausal women, fat-free mass, fat mass, cut-off values, body composition, muscle strength, cardiorespiratory fitness, functional capacity, prevalence, older women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Body Composition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Obesity, Physical Fitness, Reference Values, Body Mass Index, Postmenopause, Muscle Strength, Young Adult, Sarcopenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review