Identification of sarcopenic obesity in postmenopausal women: a cutoff proposal
Open accessAbstract
Sarcopenic obesity is the combination of reduced fat-free mass (FFM) and increased fat mass (FM) with advancing age but there is lack of clear criteria for its identification. The purposes of the present investigation were: 1) to determine the prevalence of postmenopausal women with reduced FFM relative to their FM and height, and 2) to examine whether there are associations between the proposed classification and health-related variables. A total of 607 women were included in this cross-sectional study and were separated into two subsets: 258 older women with a mean age of 66.8 ± 5.6 years and 349 young women aged 18-40 years (mean age, 29.0 ± 7.5 years). All volunteers underwent body composition assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The FFM index relative to FM and height was calculated and the cutoff value corresponded to two standard deviations below the mean of the young reference group. To examine the clinical significance of the classification, all older participants underwent measurements of quadriceps strength and cardiorespiratory fitness. Values were compared between those who were classified as low FFM or not, using an independent samples t-test and correlations were examined. The cutoff corresponded to a residual of -3.4 and generated a sarcopenic obesity prevalence of 19.8% that was associated with reduced muscle strength and aerobic fitness among the older participants. Also, the index correlated significantly with the health-related fitness variables. The results demonstrated reduced functional capacity for those below the proposed cutoff and suggested applicability of the approach as a definition for sarcopenic obesity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Three studies defined sarcopenic obesity using the population distribution of residuals from linear regression models predicting appendicular fat-free mass from height and fat mass.
“Less frequently (only 3 studies [50,81,99]) sarcopenic obesity was defined by calculating the population distribution of the residuals of linear regression models applied to predict appendicular fat-free mass (AFFM) using independent variables such as height (in meters) and fat-mass (FM) (in kg).”
From Critical appraisal of definitions and diagnostic criteria for sarcopenic obesity based on a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [81]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 68
- Authors
- Oliveira, R. J., Bottaro, M., Júnior, J. T., Farinatti, P. T. V., Bezerra, L. A., & Lima, R. M.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de Brasília (BR)
- Universidade Católica de Brasília (BR)
- Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
- Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasil
- Venue
- Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1171-1176
- ISSN
- 0100-879X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133196083
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Keywords
- sarcopenic obesity, postmenopausal women, fat-free mass, fat mass, cut-off values, body composition, muscle strength, cardiorespiratory fitness, functional capacity, prevalence, older women
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Body Composition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Obesity, Physical Fitness, Reference Values, Body Mass Index, Postmenopause, Muscle Strength, Young Adult, Sarcopenia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review