The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validação da Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale para a língua portuguesa
Open accessAbstract
A crença de auto-eficácia relaciona-se com a percepção da dor e com a funcionalidade física e psíquica dos doentes. O objetivo deste estudo foi validar para a língua portuguesa a Chronic Pain Self-efficacy Scale. A amostra foi de 132 pacientes com dor crônica de etiologia variada. A validade da escala em língua portuguesa foi confirmada pela análise fatorial, que manteve os três domínios e os 22 itens da escala original; a variância explicada foi de 60,8%. A confiabilidade, analisada pelo alfa de Cronbach, variou entre 0,76 e 0,92 para os domínios e foi de 0,94 para a escala total. A validade convergente, verificada por meio da comparação entre a Escala de Auto-Eficácia para Dor Crônica (AEDC) e o Inventário de Depressão de Beck (IDB) mostrou correlação negativa e estatisticamente significativa. Este estudo disponibiliza para a língua portuguesa um instrumento válido e confiável para a avaliação da auto-eficácia de pacientes com dor crônica.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Before the intervention, all the patients had a score below 185, which is considered the cutoff score for self-efficacy for chronic pain (Salvetti & Pimenta, 2005).”
From Acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: a quasiexperimental study (2023) · cites this paper as Salvetti & Pimenta, 2005
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self‐efficacy in people with arthritis
Lorig, K., Chastain, R. L., Ung, E., Shoor, S., & Holman, H. R. (1989) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/anr.1780320107 · Cited by 1,590
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- GATCHEL, R.J.; TURK, D.C. (eds.) -Psychosocial factors in pain: critical perspectives, Guilford Press, New York, 1999.
- KERLINGER, F.N. -Foundations of behavioral research. 3 rd ed.: Holt, Rinehard and Winston, New York, pp. 415, 1986.
- LEV, E.L. Bandura´s theory of self-efficacy: applications to oncology. Sch Inq Nurs Pract 11(1):21-37, 1997.
- O´LEARY, A. -Self-efficacy and Health. Behav Res Ther 23(4): 437-51,1985.
- RAPLEY, P.; FRUIN, D.J. -Self-efficacy in chronic illness: the juxtaposition of general and regimen-specific efficacy. Int J Nurs Pract 5(4):209-15, 1999.
- WEISENBERG M. -Cognitive aspects of pain. In: Wall P.D.; Melzack R. Textbook of pain. 4ed. WB Saunders, 1999.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: a quasiexperimental study
Miyazaki, E. S., Banaco, R. A., Domingos, N. A. M., Martins, G. B., & Miyazaki, M. C. D. O. S. (2023) · Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) · doi:10.1590/1982-0275202340e210067
Metadata
- Authors
- Salvetti, M. D. G., & Pimenta, C. A. D. M.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- Venue
- Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (São Paulo)
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 202-210
- ISSN
- 0101-6083 (ISSN-L)
- 1806-938X
- OpenAlex
- W1978129390
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (São Paulo) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- The Scientific Electronic Library Online (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Keywords
- chronic pain, self-efficacy, Portuguese translation, psychometric validation, factor structure, convergent validity, depression, pain perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
