Cited by 33Education Pedagogy and PracticesEducation and Public PolicyGlobal Educational Policies and Reforms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

O ensino fundamental no Brasil: avanços, perplexidades e tendências

Open access
Arelaro, Lisete Regina Gomes·2005·Educação & Sociedade

Abstract

O artigo faz um breve diagnóstico sobre a situação do ensino fundamental no Brasil, aponta impasses que esse nível de ensino vem enfrentando no Brasil, em especial com relação à implantação da escola fundamental de nove anos, aos debates sobre períodos e ritmos "pedagógicos", à sistemática centralizada de avaliação educacional, ao processo acelerado de municipalização, à sistemática de financiamento adotada para esse nível de ensino, bem como ao processo de (des)valorização dos trabalhadores da educação, tanto em termos de remuneração salarial como de formação profissional. Também aponta tendências para a próxima década, com destaque para a gestão educacional - menos democrática e mais "eficiente" - e o processo de privatização dos sistemas de ensino, e sua relação com as prioridades das pesquisas acadêmicas, faz uma breve análise da produção acadêmica na área do ensino fundamental no Brasil, destacando a ênfase que vem sendo dada a cada um dos grandes temas de pesquisa que este envolve e suas conseqüências para as políticas públicas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s0101-73302005000300015

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Metadata

Authors
Arelaro, L. R. G.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Arelaro, Lisete Regina Gomes
Venue
Educação & Sociedade
Published
2005-10
Volume
26
Issue
92
Pages
1039-1066
ISSN
0101-7330 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082005877
Cited by
33
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
pt
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Educação & Sociedade (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Education and Public Policy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Keywords
primary education, school finance, teacher valorization, teacher salaries, teacher professional development, educational management, privatization of education, education policy, Brazil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review