The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Health transition review
Open accessAbstract
Last trata da questão da profissionalização de agentes de saúde locais (ou indígenas, como prefere o autor) em diferentes países, indo desde o modelo soviético, caracterizado pelo controle estatal, quase que não permitindo a expressão de outras práticas que não a oficial, até os modelos nigeriano, hindu e britânico.Este último, segundo os autores, está entre os mais pluralistas.Rubinstein & Lane discutem o impacto dos grandes projetos financiados por agências internacionais como a USAID, WHO, UNICEF, dentre outras, abordando o papel do antropólogo nestes programas.Finalmente, o capítulo de P. J. Pelto & G. H. Pelto (Field Methods in Medical Anthropology) aborda, sucintamente, a questão do método antropológico e sua aplicação no estudo das doenças.Os autores apresentam o que consideram serem as questões básicas para a investigação em antropologia médica e discutem o desenho da pesquisa, unidades de pesquisa, amostragem, técnicas de entrevista e o uso de microcomputadores no campo.Contudo, não compartilho do ponto de vista expresso pelos autores de que a metodologia de pesquisa antropológica possa ser apresentada de modo ateórico (nontheoretical) ou neutro (theory-neutral).Em suma, pode-se dizer que todos os capítulos do livro são úteis e representam boas introduções aos diferentes temas tratados.Trata-se, portanto, de referência importante que pode ser usado em cursos de pós-graduação como ponto de partida para discussões mais aprofundadas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Still too far to walk: Literature review of the determinants of delivery service use
Gabrysch, S., & Campbell, O. M. (2009) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/1471-2393-9-34 · Cited by 1,255
Gender Equity in Theories of Fertility Transition
McDonald, P. (2000) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00427.x · Cited by 1,154
What about N? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studies
Carlsen, B., & Glenton, C. (2011) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-26 · Cited by 670
Blood Blockages and Scolding Nurses: Barriers to Adolescent Contraceptive Use in South Africa
Wood, K., & Jewkes, R. (2006) · Reproductive Health Matters · doi:10.1016/s0968-8080(06)27231-8 · Cited by 330
Houweling, T. A., Kunst, A. E., & Mackenbach, J. P. (2003) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/1475-9276-2-8 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Coimbra Jr., C. E. A.
- Venue
- Cadernos de Saúde Pública
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 1992-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 473-474
- ISSN
- 0102-311X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167906621
- Cited by
- 1,198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 112.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- pt
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Health transition review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1590/s0102-311x1992000400016
- The paper
- Coimbra Jr., C. E. A. (1992). Health transition review. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-311x1992000400016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.