The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
The academic plagiarism and its punishments - a review
Open accessAbstract
Currently there is an increase in the occurrence of plagiarism in varied types of academic texts. Therefore, in agreement with the Brazilian Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) policies, Brazilian higher education institutions should establish guidelines for the detection and inhibition of academic plagiarism. However, the notion of plagiarism is extremely complex, since the ability of textual construction acquired during education is also developed using others' words. Thus, it is necessary to better know the concept of plagiarism and its implications, as well as the consequences of plagiarism and the punishments that may result from it. Consequently, rules and policies to be established will be better founded in order to address the problem of plagiarism in academic texts in a comprehensive and consistent way, not only to inhibit plagiarism but also to promote education on how is possible to create texts in an original fashion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Academic plagiarism has long been prevalent in educational institutions across the world (Berlinck, 2011).”
From ChatGPT Unveiled: Understanding Perceptions of Academic Integrity in Higher Education - A Qualitative Approach (2025) · cites this paper as Berlinck, 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 13 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Berlinck, R. G. S.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Berlinck, Roberto G. S.
- Venue
- Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 365-372
- ISSN
- 0102-695X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137841774
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (publishedVersion)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education in Latin America
- Keywords
- academic plagiarism, plagiarism detection, academic integrity, plagiarism policy, higher education institutions, Brazilian higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The academic plagiarism and its punishments - a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1590/s0102-695x2011005000099
- The paper
- Berlinck, R. G. S. (2011). The academic plagiarism and its punishments - a review. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-695x2011005000099
