The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Vivências de mulheres sobre a assistência recebida no processo parturitivo
Open accessAbstract
Este artigo tem por objetivo compreender as vivências de puérperas sobre a atenção recebida durante o processo parturitivo em uma maternidade pública de Feira de Santana-Bahia. Estudo descritivo, exploratório e qualitativo, que respeitou a Resolução n. 196/96 do Conselho Nacional de Saúde, realizado no período de fevereiro a abril de 2010, através de entrevistas semiestruturadas com 19 puérperas. A análise de conteúdo e semiológica dos dados demonstrou que as entrevistadas vivenciaram o processo parturitivo com solidão, medo, dor, sofrimento, abandono, e tiveram seus filhos, sozinhas. Os únicos momentos de assistência foram limitados ao período expulsivo ou do pós-parto. Há necessidade de utilização de uma abordagem que estimule a participação ativa da mulher e de seu acompanhante, que priorize a presença constante do profissional junto à parturiente, preconize o suporte físico e emocional e o uso de novas tecnologias de cuidado que proporcionem o alívio da dor e o conforto da parturiente.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Reception tends to make the relationship between parturients and professionals easier, consequently avoiding stressful situations and anguish for women and their families.12”
From Humanization of childbirth: meanings and perceptions of nurses (2017) · cites this paper as [12]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Humanization of childbirth: meanings and perceptions of nurses
Possati, A. B., Prates, L. A., Cremonese, L., Scarton, J., Alves, C. N., & Ressel, L. B. (2017) · Escola Anna Nery · doi:10.1590/2177-9465-ean-2016-0366 · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Santos, L. M., & Pereira, S. S. D. C.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco
- Venue
- Physis: Revista de Saúde Coletiva
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77-97
- ISSN
- 0103-7331 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049517933
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- pt
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Physis Revista de Saúde Coletiva (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy-related medical research
- Keywords
- childbirth experience, women's experiences, postpartum care, public maternity hospital, labor analgesia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vivências de mulheres sobre a assistência recebida no processo parturitivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1590/s0103-73312012000100005
- The paper
- Santos, L. M., & Pereira, S. S. D. C. (2012). Vivências de mulheres sobre a assistência recebida no processo parturitivo. Physis: Revista de Saúde Coletiva. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-73312012000100005
