Cited by 52Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareReproductive Health and Contraception

Prenatal care utilization in rural areas and urban areas of Haiti

Open access
Alexandre, Pierre Kébreau, Saint-Jean, Gilbert, Crandall, Lee, Fevrin, Etzer·2005·Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study is based on the 2000 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) conducted in Haiti. Using the DHS information on women aged 15 to 49 who had given birth during the three years preceding the survey interview, this study was intended to: (1) examine the determinants of the likelihood of the women using prenatal care in the rural areas and in the urban areas of the country and (2) for the women who made at least one prenatal care visit, examine the determinants of the number of prenatal visits in the rural areas and the urban areas. METHODS: The multivariate analysis used logistic models to identify which factors explained the decision to seek prenatal care, and negative binomial models were used to determine how many prenatal visits were conducted by the subgroup of women who did make prenatal care visits. RESULTS: Estimated at the mean values of the control variables, the expected probability of using prenatal care services in rural Haiti was 77.16%, compared to 85.83% in urban Haiti. Among users of prenatal care services, mothers in rural areas made an expected number of 3.78 prenatal care visits, compared to 5.06 visits for the women in urban areas. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial percentage of pregnant women have access to prenatal care services in Haiti, but mothers in rural areas who decided to seek care still fell slightly below the four visits recommended by the World Health Organization. The education levels of both mothers and their partners is a dominant predictor of prenatal care use. Longer travel times and greater distances to health centers in rural areas constituted barriers to repeated visits. Policymakers and health care providers need to take these findings into consideration as they decide on the delivery and management of health care services in Haiti.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s1020-49892005000700002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexandre, P. K., Saint-Jean, G., Crandall, L., & Fevrin, E.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
Venue
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
Published
2005-08
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
84-92
ISSN
1020-4989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998394627
Cited by
52
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
antenatal care utilization, urban-rural differences, Haiti, maternal health, antenatal care visits, barriers to care, maternal education, partner education, health care access
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Haiti, Humans, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Rural Health Services, Urban Health Services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review