Prenatal care utilization in rural areas and urban areas of Haiti
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: This study is based on the 2000 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) conducted in Haiti. Using the DHS information on women aged 15 to 49 who had given birth during the three years preceding the survey interview, this study was intended to: (1) examine the determinants of the likelihood of the women using prenatal care in the rural areas and in the urban areas of the country and (2) for the women who made at least one prenatal care visit, examine the determinants of the number of prenatal visits in the rural areas and the urban areas. METHODS: The multivariate analysis used logistic models to identify which factors explained the decision to seek prenatal care, and negative binomial models were used to determine how many prenatal visits were conducted by the subgroup of women who did make prenatal care visits. RESULTS: Estimated at the mean values of the control variables, the expected probability of using prenatal care services in rural Haiti was 77.16%, compared to 85.83% in urban Haiti. Among users of prenatal care services, mothers in rural areas made an expected number of 3.78 prenatal care visits, compared to 5.06 visits for the women in urban areas. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial percentage of pregnant women have access to prenatal care services in Haiti, but mothers in rural areas who decided to seek care still fell slightly below the four visits recommended by the World Health Organization. The education levels of both mothers and their partners is a dominant predictor of prenatal care use. Longer travel times and greater distances to health centers in rural areas constituted barriers to repeated visits. Policymakers and health care providers need to take these findings into consideration as they decide on the delivery and management of health care services in Haiti.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In low-income countries and fragile and conflict areas, partner's education significantly predicted adequate ANC utilization.
“In low-income countries and fragile and conflict areas, pregnant women’s formal education [6, 11–15] and their partner’s education [13, 14, 16] significantly predicted adequate utilization of ANC.”
From Predictors of antenatal care utilization among the Rohingya population in the refugee camps of Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
In low-income countries and fragile and conflict areas, pregnant women's formal education significantly predicted adequate ANC utilization.
“In low-income countries and fragile and conflict areas, pregnant women’s formal education [6, 11–15] and their partner’s education [13, 14, 16] significantly predicted adequate utilization of ANC.”
From Predictors of antenatal care utilization among the Rohingya population in the refugee camps of Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
Cites
Societal and Individual Determinants of Medical Care Utilization in the United States
Andersen, R., & Newman, J. F. (1973) · The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society · doi:10.2307/3349613 · Cited by 2,838 · see citing works
WHO systematic review of randomised controlled trials of routine antenatal care
Carroli, G., Villar, J., Piaggio, G., Khan-Neelofur, D., Gülmezoglu, M., Mugford, M., Lumbiganon, P., Farnot, U., & Bersgjø, P. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04723-1 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Simon, D., Michael, D., Rahman, M. S., Hiott, M. C., Rahim, A., Sanin, K. I., Tofail, F., & Wuermli, A. J. (2025) · Conflict and Health · doi:10.1186/s13031-025-00733-6 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“We expected to find relations between the woman’s years of formal education with ANC behaviors given the robust association in literature [6, 11, 13, 14, 46].”
- Authors
- Alexandre, P. K., Saint-Jean, G., Crandall, L., & Fevrin, E.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of Miami (US)
- Venue
- Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 84-92
- ISSN
- 1020-4989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998394627
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Keywords
- antenatal care utilization, urban-rural differences, Haiti, maternal health, antenatal care visits, barriers to care, maternal education, partner education, health care access
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Haiti, Humans, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Rural Health Services, Urban Health Services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review