Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reference equations for the six-minute walk distance based on a Brazilian multicenter study

Open access
Britto, Raquel R., Probst, Vanessa S., Andrade, Armele F. Dornelas de, Samora, Giane A. R., Hernandes, Nidia A., Marinho, Patricia E. M., Karsten, Marlus, Pitta, Fabio, Parreira, Veronica F.·2013·Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is important to include large sample sizes and different factors that influence the six-minute walking distance (6MWD) in order to propose reference equations for the six-minute walking test (6 MWT). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of anthropometric, demographic, and physiologic variables on the 6 MWD of healthy subjects from different regions of Brazil to establish a reference equation for the Brazilian population. METHOD: In a multicenter study, 617 healthy subjects performed two 6 MWTs and had their weight, height, and body mass index (BMI) measured, as well as their physiologic responses to the test. Delta heart rate (∆HR), perceived effort, and peripheral oxygen saturation were calculated by the difference between the respective values at the end of the test minus the baseline value. RESULTS: Walking distance averaged 586 ± 106 m, 54 m greater in male compared to female subjects (p<0.001). No differences were observed among the 6 MWD from different regions. The quadratic regression analysis considering only anthropometric and demographic data explained 46% of the variability in the 6 MWT (p<0.001) and derived the equation: 6 MWD(pred)=890.46-(6.11 × age)+(0.0345 × age(2))+(48.87 × gender)-(4.87 × BMI). A second model of stepwise multiple regression including ∆HR explained 62% of the variability (p<0.0001) and derived the equation: 6 MWD(pred)=356.658-(2.303 × age)+(36.648 × gender)+(1.704 × height)+(1.365×∆HR). CONCLUSION: The equations proposed in this study, especially the second one, seem adequate to accurately predict the 6 MWD for Brazilians.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s1413-35552012005000122

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Metadata

Authors
Britto, R. R., Probst, V. S., Andrade, A. F. D. D., Samora, G. A. R., Hernandes, N. A., Marinho, P. E. M., Karsten, M., Pitta, F., & Parreira, V. F.
Venue
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Published
2013-12
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
556-563
ISSN
1413-3555 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119910088
Cited by
294
References
28
FWCI
22.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reference equations for the six-minute walk distance based on a Brazilian multicenter study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1590/s1413-35552012005000122
The paper
Britto, R. R., Probst, V. S., Andrade, A. F. D. D., Samora, G. A. R., Hernandes, N. A., Marinho, P. E. M., Karsten, M., Pitta, F., & Parreira, V. F. (2013). Reference equations for the six-minute walk distance based on a Brazilian multicenter study. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-35552012005000122

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.