Cited by 20Plant Stress Responses and TolerancePhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsPlant responses to elevated CO2

Differential responses of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activities of two Vigna unguiculata cultivars to salt stress

Open access
Aragão, Maria Erivalda Farias de, Guedes, Marjorie Moreira, Otoch, Maria de Lourdes Oliveira, Guedes, Maria Izabel Florindo, Melo, Dirce Fernandes de, Lima, Maria da Guia Silva·2005·Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology

Abstract

Vita 3 and Vita 5 are two Vigna unguiculata cultivars that differ in their capacities for survival in saline environments; Vita 3 is more tolerant and Vita 5 more sensitive. Both cultivars were submitted to salt stress with 0.1 M NaCl. After 8 days, root and shoot growth from both cultivars was reduced but reduction was more pronounced in Vita 5. Furthermore, leaf area was also reduced in this cultivar. Chlorophyll content and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were not affected by salt stress, but the specific activities of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) decreased in Vita 3 and increased in Vita 5. The use of immunological techniques also revealed that the Rubisco content from Vita 3 decreased while that of Vita 5 increased. The discussion of these results is aimed at reaching a better understanding of the differences between these cultivars in relation to salt stress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s1677-04202005000200003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rubisco can also be affected by salt in vivo.

    “Flowers et al. (1977) reported that Rubisco activity is inhibited in vitro by high levels of salt, while Aragao et al. (2005) suggested that Rubisco can also be affected by salt in vivo (Table 2).”

    From Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview (2013) · cites this paper as Aragao et al. 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aragão, M. E. F. D., Guedes, M. M., Otoch, M. D. L. O., Guedes, M. I. F., Melo, D. F. D., & Lima, M. D. G. S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual do Ceará (BR)
  • Universidade Federal do Ceará (BR)
  • Universidade Federal do Ceará, Brasil
Venue
Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology
Published
2005-06
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
207-212
ISSN
  • 0103-3131 (ISSN-L)
  • 1677-0420
OpenAlex
W2046565352
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • The Scientific Electronic Library Online (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant responses to elevated CO2
Keywords
cowpea, salt stress, salt tolerance, Rubisco, cultivar differences, sodium chloride, root and shoot growth, leaf area, chlorophyll fluorescence, Rubisco content

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review