The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plantar Pressure Distribution Patterns During Gait in Diabetic Neuropathy Patients with a History of Foot Ulcers
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate and compare the influence of a previous history of foot ulcers on plantar pressure variables during gait of patients with diabetic neuropathy. INTRODUCTION: Foot ulcers may be an indicator of worsening diabetic neuropathy. However, the behavior of plantar pressure patterns over time and during the progression of neuropathy, especially in patients who have a clinical history of foot ulcers, is still unclear. METHODS: Subjects were divided into the following groups: control group, 20 subjects; diabetic neuropathy patients without foot ulcers, 17 subjects; and diabetic neuropathy patients with at least one healed foot ulcer within the last year, 10 subjects. Plantar pressure distribution was recorded during barefoot gait using the Pedar-X system. RESULTS: Neuropathic subjects from both the diabetic neuropathy and DNU groups showed higher plantar pressure than control subjects. At midfoot, the peak pressure was significantly different among all groups: control group (139.4+/-76.4 kPa), diabetic neuropathy (205.3+/-118.6 kPa) and DNU (290.7+/-151.5 kPa) (p=0.008). The pressure-time integral was significantly higher in the ulcerated neuropathic groups at midfoot (CG: 37.3+/-11.4 kPa.s; DN: 43.3+/-9.1 kPa.s; DNU: 68.7+/-36.5 kPa.s; p=0.002) and rearfoot (CG: 83.3+/-21.2 kPa.s; DN: 94.9+/-29.4 kPa.s; DNU: 102.5+/-37.9 kPa.s; p=0.048). CONCLUSION: A history of foot ulcers in the clinical history of diabetic neuropathy subjects influenced plantar pressure distribution, resulting in an increased load under the midfoot and rearfoot and an increase in the variability of plantar pressure during barefoot gait. The progression of diabetic neuropathy was not found to influence plantar pressure distribution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pham, H., Armstrong, D. G., Harvey, C., Harkless, L. B., Giurini, J. M., & Veves, A. (2000) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.23.5.606 · Cited by 654
Cited by
Lee, Y., Park, J., Cho, S., Shin, Y.-E., Lee, H., Kim, J., Myoung, J., Cho, S., Kang, S., Baig, C., et al. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b01805 · Cited by 528
Metadata
- Authors
- Bacarin, T. A., Sacco, I. C. N., & Hennig, E. M.
- Venue
- Clinics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-120
- ISSN
- 1807-5932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148387792
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plantar Pressure Distribution Patterns During Gait in Diabetic Neuropathy Patients with a History of Foot Ulcers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1590/s1807-59322009000200008
- The paper
- Bacarin, T. A., Sacco, I. C. N., & Hennig, E. M. (2009). Plantar Pressure Distribution Patterns During Gait in Diabetic Neuropathy Patients with a History of Foot Ulcers. Clinics. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1807-59322009000200008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.