The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
A Grounded Theory como abordagem metodológica: relatos de uma experiência de campo
Open accessAbstract
Uma vez que já é possível encontrar no Brasil alguns artigos que contemplam questões atinentes ao histórico, tipologias e principais características da grounded theory, este trabalho tem por finalidade contribuir para uma maior discussão dessa abordagem metodológica enquanto estilo de fazer pesquisa. De maneira específica, o trabalho tenta descrever uma experiência de campo e, principalmente, contar a saga de um pesquisador envolvido com o desafio de colocar a grounded theory em prática. Para isso, buscou-se dividir o trabalho em três partes distintas. Na primeira parte, apresentamos a grounded theory de uma maneira ampla, introduzindo alguns dos seus princípios fundamentais. Na segunda parte, descreve-se o trabalho de campo que foi realizado - nos moldes da grounded theory - com o objetivo de investigar a forma como os consumidores brasileiros oriundos das classes mais populares vivenciam suas experiências de consumo de produtos eletrônicos. Na terceira e última parte, são apresentadas algumas reflexões sobre as exigências práticas para a "operacionalização" de pesquisas comprometidas com o "espírito" da grounded theory, bem como as dúvidas, os dilemas, as dificuldades e as angústias vivenciadas ao longo de todo o processo de pesquisa contadas por quem passou por elas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The path to substantive and adaptivesubstantive theories focused on the management field demands the data collection phase (induction), which leads to one or more imaginative processes (abduction) to form a hypothesis (deduction) to be tested and/or validated through a new cycle of primary data collection (induction) -it just goes on until theoretical saturation is achieved, and a new theory emerg”
From Deconstructing the Glaser-Strauss Dilemma: Integrative Discussion about the Grounded Theory in Management (2023) · cites this paper as Pinto & Santos, 2012
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Strauss and Corbin (1998) pointed out that pure induction and pure deduction are sterile; new theories result from the combination of induction (inducing concepts and properties based on primary data), deduction (effort to propose hypotheses and/or construct propositions about relationships between concepts extracted by researchers through induction) and assessment and/or validation (assessing whe”
From Deconstructing the Glaser-Strauss Dilemma: Integrative Discussion about the Grounded Theory in Management (2023) · cites this paper as Pinto & Santos, 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 21
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- AGAR Michael H., 2006, Softwares em pesquisa aualitativa, 429
- AGAR Michael H., 2006, Grounded theory, 241
- AARTS Bas, 2002, A construção do corpus: um princípio para a coleta de dados qualitativos, 39
- CHARMAZ K., 2000, Constructivist and objectivist grounded theory, 509
- EGAN T. Marshall, 2002, Grounded theory research and theory building, Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4, 277, 10.1177/1523422302043004 · DOI
- FLICK Uwe, 2002, Entrevistas individuais e grupais, 64
- HAIG Brian D., 1995, Grounded theory as scientific method, 281
- KELLE Udo, 2002, Análise com auxílio de computador: codificação e indexação, 393
- MIGUELES Carmen, 2007, Introdução, 9
- MUHR T., 1991, ATLAS/ti: a prototype for the support of text interpretation, Qualitative Sociology, 14, 349, 10.1007/BF00989645 · DOI
- SCHWANDT Thomas A., 2006, Três posturas epistemológicas para a investigação qualitativa: interpretativismo, hermenêutica e construcionismo social, 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Pinto, M. D. R., & Santos, L. L. D. S.
- Affiliations
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (BR)
- Venue
- Organizações & Sociedade
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 62
- Pages
- 417-436
- ISSN
- 1413-585X (ISSN-L)
- 1984-9230
- OpenAlex
- W2133445288
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- pt
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Organizações & Sociedade (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Management Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer Behavior and Market Dynamics
- Keywords
- grounded theory, research methodology, practicum, customer experience, electronic devices, low-income consumers, researcher self-reflection, Brazilian consumers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Grounded Theory como abordagem metodológica: relatos de uma experiência de campo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1590/s1984-92302012000300003
- The paper
- Pinto, M. D. R., & Santos, L. L. D. S. (2012). A Grounded Theory como abordagem metodológica: relatos de uma experiência de campo. Organizações & Sociedade. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-92302012000300003