The DOI matches its Crossref record.
EL RIESGO DEL USO EXCESIVO DE LAS REDES SOCIALES EN LOS ESTUDIANTES DE LATINOAMÉRICA
Open accessAbstract
El tema denominado para el presente artículo es “El riesgo del uso excesivo de las redes sociales en los estudiantes de Latinoamérica según las investigaciones de los últimos 10 años”. Dentro del marco de investigación hemos definido como objetivo general identificar los riesgos que ocasiona el hacer uso excesivo de las redes sociales en estudiantes de Latinoamérica, según investigaciones de los últimos 10 años.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Condori Sinty, T., Quispe Mamani, A., & Quiro Sucapuca, Y. (2023) · Revista Científica de Ciencias de la Salud · doi:10.17162/rccs.v16i2.1959 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Armaza Deza, J. F.
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 2023-01-10
- OpenAlex
- W4313988793
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- es
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Communication › Digital Media and Philosophy
- Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
- Keywords
- excessive social media use, social media risks, university students, Latin America, student well-being
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
