The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pharmaceutical Care of Patients with Congestive Heart Failure: Interventions and Outcomes
Abstract
We evaluated a structured pharmaceutical care program for elderly patients (> 65 yrs) with congestive heart failure (CHF) based on objective measures of disease control, quality of life, and use of health care facilities in a randomized, controlled, longitudinal, prospective clinical trial. The 42 patients in group A received education from a pharmacist on the disease and its treatment, and lifestyle changes that could help control symptoms. Patients also were encouraged to monitor their symptoms and comply with prescribed drug therapy. If necessary, dosage regimens were simplified in liaison with hospital physicians. The 41 control patients (group B) received standard care. The following outcome measures were assessed in all patients at baseline (before the start of the trial) and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months: 2‐minute walk test, blood pressure, body weight, pulse, forced vital capacity, quality of life [disease‐specific (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire) and generic (SF‐36)], knowledge of symptoms and drugs, compliance with therapy, and use of health care facilities (hospital admissions, visits to emergency room, emergency calls). Patients in group A showed improved compliance with drug therapy, which in turn improved their exercise capacity compared with those in group B; education on management of symptoms, lifestyle changes, and dietary recommendations were also of benefit. Group A patients significantly improved knowledge of their drug therapy over the 12‐month study and had fewer hospital admissions compared with group B patients. They also had improved outcomes compared with group B, despite the small samples. An extension of this trial to other sites with pooling of results would provide additional evidence of the value of this structured program in elderly patients with CHF.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Viswanathan, M., Golin, C. E., Jones, C. D., Ashok, M., Blalock, S. J., Wines, R. C. M., Coker-Schwimmer, E. J. L., Rosen, D. L., Sista, P., & Lohr, K. N. (2012) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-157-11-201212040-00538 · Cited by 754
Pharmacist Intervention to Improve Medication Adherence in Heart Failure: A Randomized Trial
Murray, M. D., Young, J., Hoke, S., Tu, W., Weiner, M., Morrow, D., Stroupe, K. T., Wu, J., Clark, D., Smith, F., et al. (2007) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-146-10-200705150-00005 · Cited by 470
Systematic review of multidisciplinary interventions in heart failure
Holland, R., Battersby, J., Harvey, I., Lenaghan, E., Smith, J., & Hay, L. (2005) · Heart · doi:10.1136/hrt.2004.048389 · Cited by 398
Roccaforte, R., Demers, C., Baldassarre, F., K. Teo, K., & Yusuf, S. (2005) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1016/j.ejheart.2005.08.005 · Cited by 342
Holland, R., Lenaghan, E., Harvey, I., Smith, R., Shepstone, L., Lipp, A., Christou, M., Evans, D., & Hand, C. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38338.674583.ae · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Varma, S., McElnay, J. C., Hughes, C. M., Passmore, A. P., & Varma, M.
- Venue
- Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 860-869
- ISSN
- 0277-0008 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-9114
- OpenAlex
- W1981589128
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pharmaceutical Care of Patients with Congestive Heart Failure: Interventions and Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1592/phco.19.10.860.31565
- The paper
- Varma, S., McElnay, J. C., Hughes, C. M., Passmore, A. P., & Varma, M. (1999). Pharmaceutical Care of Patients with Congestive Heart Failure: Interventions and Outcomes. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1592/phco.19.10.860.31565
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.