The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessment of a Community Pharmacy‐Based Program for Patients with Asthma
Abstract
Study Objective. To implement and assess a community‐based pharmaceutical care program for patients with asthma. Design. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Setting. Community pharmacies (11 control, 11 intervention) in Malta. Patients. Community‐dwelling patients with asthma. Interventions. A comprehensive asthma education and monitoring program was implemented. Intervention patients received verbal counseling, an educational video, an information leaflet, and subsequent monitoring with reinforcement; control patients received routine dispensing services. Measurements and Main Results. Parameters assessed at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 months were health‐related quality of life, peak expiratory flow (PEF), inhaler technique, compliance with therapy, hospitalization rates, days lost from work, asthma symptoms, and patient satisfaction. Health‐related quality of life of the intervention patients improved at 12 months (p=0.044). In the same time period, PEF significantly decreased in control patients compared with intervention patients (p=0.009) whereas inhaler technique improved in the intervention group (p=0.021). There were significantly fewer self‐reported hospitalizations in intervention patients. Conclusions. A community‐based pharmaceutical care program was appreciated by the participants and had a positive impact on the vitality of patients with asthma, inhaler technique, and PEF.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interventions for enhancing medication adherence
Nieuwlaat, R., Wilczynski, N., Navarro, T., Hobson, N., Jeffery, R., Keepanasseril, A., Agoritsas, T., Mistry, N., Iorio, A., Jack, S., et al. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000011.pub4 · Cited by 2,945
British Guideline on the Management of Asthma
British Thoracic Society Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (2008) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.2008.097741 · Cited by 2,021
Interventions for enhancing medication adherence
Haynes, R. B., Ackloo, E., Sahota, N., McDonald, H. P., & Yao, X. (2008) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000011.pub3 · Cited by 1,244
Interventions for enhancing medication adherence
Haynes, R., Yao, X., Degani, A., Kripalani, S., Garg, A., & McDonald, H. (2005) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000011.pub2 · Cited by 517
Appropriateness of metered-dose inhaler use in the Yemeni community pharmacies
Ali Al-Worafi, Y. M. (2015) · Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jtumed.2014.10.002 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Cordina, M., & McElnay, J. C.
- Venue
- Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1196-1203
- ISSN
- 0277-0008 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-9114
- OpenAlex
- W2023565700
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of a Community Pharmacy‐Based Program for Patients with Asthma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1592/phco.21.15.1196.33894
- The paper
- Cordina, M., & McElnay, J. C. (2001). Assessment of a Community Pharmacy‐Based Program for Patients with Asthma. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1592/phco.21.15.1196.33894
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.