The Echinocandins
Abstract
The changing pattern in fungal infections has driven the need to expand the targets of antifungal activity. The echinocandins are the newest addition to the arsenal against fungal infections. Three echinocandins have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration: caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin. These agents have a broad spectrum of activity and are similar to each other with respect to in vitro activity against Candida sp, with micafungin and anidulafungin having similar minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) that are generally lower than the MIC of capsofungin. The MICs of the echinocandins are highest against Candida parapsilosis; however, whether this will affect clinical outcomes is unknown. Several case reports have identified clinical failure due to elevated MICs with caspofungin or micafungin against Candida albicans, Candida krusei, and C. parapsilosis. Resistance to the echinocandin class was present in some but not all of the isolates. Empiric therapy with one of the echinocandins for candidemia or invasive candidiasis in patients with neutropenia and those without neutropenia appears to be appropriate when one factors in mortality rate, the increasing frequency of non‐albicans Candida infections, and the broad spectrum, safety, and fungicidal effect of the echinocandins. After speciation of the organism, continued therapy with an echinocandin can and should be reevaluated. The echinocandins demonstrate similar in vitro and in vivo activity against Aspergillus sp, but only caspofungin is approved for treatment in patients who are intolerant of or refractory to other therapies. Voriconazole and amphotericin B have demonstrated synergy with the echinocandins. The clinical response to combination therapy has been variable; however, the mortality rate appears to be lower with combination therapy than monotherapy. Large controlled trials are needed to determine the role of combination therapy for invasive aspergillosis. Micafungin and anidulafungin generally have a lower frequency of adverse reactions compared with caspofungin. Phlebitis (3.5–25% of patients) and elevated liver enzyme levels (1–15%) occur more often with caspofungin compared with micafungin and anidulafungin (< 8%). Overall, the three echinocandins are relatively safe and effective agents for the treatment of Candida infections.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin exhibit concentration-dependent fungicidal activity against most species of Candida.
“All three agents (caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin) exhibit concentration-dependent fungicidal activity against most species of Candida [25, 26]”
From <i>Candida</i>Infections, Causes, Targets, and Resistance Mechanisms: Traditional and Alternative Antifungal Agents (2013) · cites this paper as [25]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 100 · Cited by 205
- Authors
- Cappelletty, D., & Eiselstein‐McKitrick, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Toledo (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cappelletty, Diane
- Venue
- Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 369-388
- ISSN
- 0277-0008 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-9114
- OpenAlex
- W4253591609
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 100
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 2.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
- Keywords
- echinocandins, caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin, antifungal agents, candidiasis, invasive candidiasis, candidemia, Candida parapsilosis, Candida albicans, Candida krusei, antifungal resistance, minimum inhibitory concentration, invasive aspergillosis, combination therapy, voriconazole, amphotericin B, adverse drug reactions, phlebitis, elevated liver enzymes, neutropenia, empirical antifungal therapy
- MeSH terms
- Caspofungin, Micafungin, Anidulafungin, Antifungal Agents, Aspergillus, Candida albicans, Cryptococcus, Fungal Proteins, Humans, Lipoproteins, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Mycoses, Peptides, Cyclic, Echinocandins, Lipopeptides
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review