Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 77

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Potential Glucosamine‐Warfarin Interaction Resulting in Increased International Normalized Ratio: Case Report and Review of the Literature and MedWatch Database

Knudsen, James F., Sokol, Gerald H.·2008·Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy

Abstract

We describe a 71‐year‐old man who had received warfarin 7.5 mg/day for 5 years for atrial fibrillation, which had maintained his international normalized ratio (INR) within a narrow range of 2.5‐3.2. During this 5‐year period, he had also been treating himself with the supplement glucosamine hydrochloride 500 mg‐chondroitin sulfate 400 mg twice/day for arthritis. The patient then increased his dosage of glucosamine to 1500 mg and chondroitin to 1200 mg twice/day; his INR previous to this change was 2.3. Approximately 3 weeks later, his INR increased to 3.9. His supplement dosage was reduced to glucosamine 750 mg‐chondroitin 600 mg/day; a repeat INR done 16 days later was 4.7. The supplement was then stopped, and his warfarin schedule was changed to 7.5 mg every other day alternating with 3.75 mg every other day. Sixteen days later, his INR was 2.6. This case report suggests that a potential interaction exists between warfarin and glucosamine that is associated with an increase in the INR. We therefore performed a pharmacovigilance survey of spontaneously reported adverse events in warfarin‐treated patients concomitantly exposed to glucosamine, glucosamine‐chondroitin sulfate, or chondroitin sulfate and present a literature review of this apparent drug‐drug interaction. Using the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) MedWatch database, 20 reports of glucosamine or glucosamine‐chondroitin sulfate use with warfarin associated with altered coagulation (manifested by increased INR, or increased bleeding or bruising) were identified. In some cases, a decrease in the supplement dosage was followed by a return of the INR to the previous therapeutic range. Similarly, a decrease in warfarin dosage was followed by a decrease in INR in one patient who received long‐term warfarin therapy. One report described an intraventricular bleed and subdural hematoma, which resulted in a persistent vegetative state. The World Health Organization (WHO) adverse drug reactions database documented 21 spontaneous reports of increased INR associated with glucosamine use, 17 of which resolved when glucosamine was stopped. We located one published case report of concomitant use of glucosamine‐chondroitin sulfate potentiating the effect of warfarin. In aggregate, the reports from the FDA and WHO, the published case report, and our case report suggest that the use of warfarin and glucosamine may lead to an increased INR. Patients should be advised that the use of the two products may cause an increase in INR, and they should inform their health care provider if they consume glucosamine. More information is necessary to define this interaction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1592/phco.28.4.540

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Barnes PM, 2004, Complimentary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States 2002
  2. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2006.02590.x · DOI
  3. 10.1001/archinte.167.13.1414 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.thromres.2005.06.009 · DOI
  5. Rozenfeld V, 2004, Possible augmentation of warfarin effect by glucosamine‐chondroitin, Am J Health-Syst Pharm, 61, 306, 10.1093/ajhp/61.3.306 · DOI · Paper page
  6. General Accounting Office, 2000, Adverse drug event: magnitude of health risk is uncertain because of limited incidence data
  7. 10.1024/0300-9831.76.2.65 · DOI
  8. Shearer MJ, 1996, Chemistry, nutritional sources, tissue distribution and metabolism of vitamin K with special reference to bone health, J Nutr, 124, S1181, 10.1093/jn/126.suppl_4.1181S · DOI
  9. 10.1146/annurev.nutr.25.050304.092713 · DOI
  10. 10.2337/diabetes.55.01.06.db05-0633 · DOI
  11. 10.1378/chest.108.4_Supplement.231S · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02744.x · DOI
  13. Ouirke W, 2007, Warfarin prevalence, indications for use and haemorrhagic events, Ir Med J, 100, 402
  14. Bristol‐Myers Squibb Company, 2003, Coumadin (warfarin sodium) package insert
  15. Goldstein A, 1973, Principles of drug action: the basis of pharmacology, 160
  16. Setnikar I, 1993, Pharmacokinetics of glucosamine in man, Arzneimittelforschung, 43, 1109
  17. 10.1093/ajcn/47.3.475 · DOI
  18. Bechtold H, 1984, Evidence for impaired hepatic vitamin K metabolism in patients treated with N‐methyl‐thiotetrazole cephalosporins, Thromb Haemost, 51, 358, 10.1055/s-0038-1661101 · DOI
  19. 10.1182/blood-2006-09-049262 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Knudsen, J. F., & Sokol, G. H.
Venue
Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-04
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
540-548
ISSN
  • 0277-0008
  • 1875-9114
Cited by
77
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.