Cited by 42Glioma Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer Mechanisms and TherapyHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research

EGFR and c-Met cross talk in glioblastoma and its regulation by human cord blood stem cells

Open access
Velpula, Kiran Kumar, Dasari, Venkata Ramesh, Asuthkar, Swapna, Gorantla, Bharathi, Tsung, Andrew J.·2012·Translational Oncology

Abstract

Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) and their ligands control critical biologic processes, such as cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation. Aberrant expression of these receptor kinases in tumor cells alters multiple downstream signaling cascades that ultimately drive the malignant phenotype by enhancing tumor cell proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis. As observed in human glioblastoma (hGBM) and other cancers, this dysregulation of RTK networks correlates with poor patient survival. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and c-Met, two well-known receptor kinases, are coexpressed in multiple cancers including hGBM, corroborating that their downstream signaling pathways enhance a malignant phenotype. The integration of c-Met and EGFR signaling in cancer cells indicates that treatment regimens designed to target both receptor pathways simultaneously could prove effective, though resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors continues to be a substantial obstacle. In the present study, we analyzed the antitumor efficacy of EGFR inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib and c-Met inhibitor PHA-665752, along with their respective small hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) alone or in combination with human umbilical cord blood stem cells (hUCBSCs), in glioma cell lines and in animal xenograft models. We also measured the effect of dual inhibition of EGFR/c-Met pathways on invasion and wound healing. Combination treatments of hUCBSC with tyrosine kinase inhibitors significantly inhibited invasion and wound healing in U251 and 5310 cell lines, thereby indicating the role of hUCBSC in inhibition of RTK-driven cell behavior. Further, the EGFR and c-Met localization in glioma cells and hGBM clinical specimens indicated that a possible cross talk exists between EGFR and c-Met signaling pathway.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1593/tlo.12235

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In most cancer cells, activation of c-Met requires EGFR and vice versa.

    “In most of these cancer cells, the activation of c-Met requires EGFR and vice versa.”

    From Candida albicans stimulates formation of a multi-receptor complex that mediates epithelial cell invasion during oropharyngeal infection (2023) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Results section ('EGFR Inhibitors Annihilate c-Met Signaling Molecules'; page unavailable) reports that inhibiting either receptor reduced activation of the other in two glioblastoma cell lines. That supports reciprocal cross-talk, but not a strict requirement in most cancer cells. The Discussion (page unavailable) also describes a setting in which EGFR signaling functions independently of c-Met. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • An additive or synergistic interaction between c-Met and EGFR has been found in multiple types of cancer cells, including breast cancer, hepatomas, and glioblastomas.

    “An additive or synergistic interaction between c-Met and EGFR has been found in multiple types of cancer cells, including breast cancer, hepatomas, and glioblastomas [33–35].”

    From Candida albicans stimulates formation of a multi-receptor complex that mediates epithelial cell invasion during oropharyngeal infection (2023) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports positive EGFR–c-Met cross talk in glioma cells. The Introduction (page unavailable) describes their coexpression in breast cancer and functional interaction in SUM229 cells. Our copy does not establish an additive or synergistic interaction in hepatomas, so it does not support the full list of cancer types. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Velpula, K. K., Dasari, V. R., Asuthkar, S., Gorantla, B., & Tsung, A. J.
Affiliations
Peoria campus of the University of Illinois System (US)
Corresponding author
Tsung, Andrew J.
Venue
Translational Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
379-IN18
ISSN
1936-5233 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103850766
Cited by
42
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Translational Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Keywords
glioblastoma, EGFR, c-Met, human umbilical cord blood stem cells, erlotinib, gefitinib, PHA-665752, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, shRNA, glioma invasion, wound healing, combination therapy, xenograft models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review