EGFR and c-Met cross talk in glioblastoma and its regulation by human cord blood stem cells
Open accessAbstract
Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) and their ligands control critical biologic processes, such as cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation. Aberrant expression of these receptor kinases in tumor cells alters multiple downstream signaling cascades that ultimately drive the malignant phenotype by enhancing tumor cell proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis. As observed in human glioblastoma (hGBM) and other cancers, this dysregulation of RTK networks correlates with poor patient survival. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and c-Met, two well-known receptor kinases, are coexpressed in multiple cancers including hGBM, corroborating that their downstream signaling pathways enhance a malignant phenotype. The integration of c-Met and EGFR signaling in cancer cells indicates that treatment regimens designed to target both receptor pathways simultaneously could prove effective, though resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors continues to be a substantial obstacle. In the present study, we analyzed the antitumor efficacy of EGFR inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib and c-Met inhibitor PHA-665752, along with their respective small hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) alone or in combination with human umbilical cord blood stem cells (hUCBSCs), in glioma cell lines and in animal xenograft models. We also measured the effect of dual inhibition of EGFR/c-Met pathways on invasion and wound healing. Combination treatments of hUCBSC with tyrosine kinase inhibitors significantly inhibited invasion and wound healing in U251 and 5310 cell lines, thereby indicating the role of hUCBSC in inhibition of RTK-driven cell behavior. Further, the EGFR and c-Met localization in glioma cells and hGBM clinical specimens indicated that a possible cross talk exists between EGFR and c-Met signaling pathway.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In most cancer cells, activation of c-Met requires EGFR and vice versa.
“In most of these cancer cells, the activation of c-Met requires EGFR and vice versa.”
From Candida albicans stimulates formation of a multi-receptor complex that mediates epithelial cell invasion during oropharyngeal infection (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
The Results section ('EGFR Inhibitors Annihilate c-Met Signaling Molecules'; page unavailable) reports that inhibiting either receptor reduced activation of the other in two glioblastoma cell lines. That supports reciprocal cross-talk, but not a strict requirement in most cancer cells. The Discussion (page unavailable) also describes a setting in which EGFR signaling functions independently of c-Met. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAn additive or synergistic interaction between c-Met and EGFR has been found in multiple types of cancer cells, including breast cancer, hepatomas, and glioblastomas.
“An additive or synergistic interaction between c-Met and EGFR has been found in multiple types of cancer cells, including breast cancer, hepatomas, and glioblastomas [33–35].”
From Candida albicans stimulates formation of a multi-receptor complex that mediates epithelial cell invasion during oropharyngeal infection (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports positive EGFR–c-Met cross talk in glioma cells. The Introduction (page unavailable) describes their coexpression in breast cancer and functional interaction in SUM229 cells. Our copy does not establish an additive or synergistic interaction in hepatomas, so it does not support the full list of cancer types. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Understanding resistance to EGFR inhibitors—impact on future treatment strategies
Wheeler, D. L., Dunn, E. F., & Harari, P. M. (2010) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.97 · Cited by 683 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Phan, Q. T., Solis, N. V., Cravener, M. V., Swidergall, M., Lin, J., Huang, M. Y., Liu, H., Singh, S., Ibrahim, A. S., Mazzone, M., et al. (2023) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1011579 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Velpula, K. K., Dasari, V. R., Asuthkar, S., Gorantla, B., & Tsung, A. J.
- Affiliations
- Peoria campus of the University of Illinois System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tsung, Andrew J.
- Venue
- Translational Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 379-IN18
- ISSN
- 1936-5233 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3468927
- OpenAlex
- W2103850766
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 1.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Translational Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
- Keywords
- glioblastoma, EGFR, c-Met, human umbilical cord blood stem cells, erlotinib, gefitinib, PHA-665752, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, shRNA, glioma invasion, wound healing, combination therapy, xenograft models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review