The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Designing Household Survey Questionnaires for Developing Countries : Lessons from 15 Years of the Living Standards Measurement Study, Volume 2
Open accessAbstract
The objective of this book is to provide detailed advice on how to design multi-topic household surveys based on the experience of past household surveys. The book will help identify define objectives, identify data needed to analyze objectives, and draft questionnaires to collect such data. Much of the book is based on the experience of the World Bank's Living Standard's Measurement Study (LSMS) program, established in 1980 to explore ways the accuracy, timeliness, and policy relevance of household survey data collected in developing countries. It is part of an attempt to extend the range of policy issues that can be analyzed with LSMS data; to increase the reliability and accuracy of the surveys; and to make it easier to implement LSMS surveys. The books first discuss the "big picture" concerning the overall design of surveys, modules to be used, and procedures for combining modules into questionnaires and questionnaires into surveys. Individual modules are discussed in depth as well as major policy issues. The process of manipulating modules to form a better 'fit' in the case of a specific survey is examined. Specific modules include: consumption, education, health employment, anthropometry, non-labor income, housing, price data, environmental issues, fertility, household income, savings, household enterprises, and time use. The third volume provides draft questionnaires, referenced in the prior chapters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Measuring Social Capital: An Integrated Questionnaire
Grootaert, C., Narayan, D., Jones, V. N., & Woolcock, M. (2004) · World Bank Working Papers · doi:10.1596/0-8213-5661-5 · Cited by 758
Hypertension in Sub-Saharan Africa: Cross-Sectional Surveys in Four Rural and Urban Communities
Hendriks, M. E., Wit, F. W. N. M., Roos, M. T. L., Brewster, L. M., Akande, T. M., de Beer, I. H., Mfinanga, S. G., Kahwa, A. M., Gatongi, P., Van Rooy, G., et al. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032638 · Cited by 417
Measuring microenterprise profits: Must we ask how the sausage is made?
de Mel, S., McKenzie, D. J., & Woodruff, C. (2009) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.01.007 · Cited by 367
Who pays for health care in Asia?
O’Donnell, O., van Doorslaer, E., Rannan-Eliya, R. P., Somanathan, A., Adhikari, S. R., Akkazieva, B., Harbianto, D., Garg, C. C., Hanvoravongchai, P., Herrin, A. N., et al. (2008) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.08.005 · Cited by 326
Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data
O’Donnell, O., van Doorslaer, E. K. A., Wagstaff, W., & Lindelöw, M. (2008) · University Libraries (University of Maryland) · doi:10.13016/fcm7-vvv1 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Glewwe, P., & Grosh, M.
- Venue
- World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks
- Publisher
- Washington, DC: World Bank
- Published
- 2000-05
- OpenAlex
- W1527264370
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.61
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Designing Household Survey Questionnaires for Developing Countries : Lessons from 15 Years of the Living Standards Measurement Study, Volume 2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1596/0-19-521595-8
- The paper
- Glewwe, P., & Grosh, M. (2000). Designing Household Survey Questionnaires for Developing Countries : Lessons from 15 Years of the Living Standards Measurement Study, Volume 2. World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-19-521595-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.