The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Natural Resources and Violent Conflict: Options and Actions
Open accessAbstract
Recent research undertaken by the Bank and others, suggest that developing countries face substantially higher risks of violent conflict, and poor governance if highly dependent on primary commodities. Revenues from the legal, or illegal exploitation of natural resources have financed devastating conflicts in large numbers of countries across regions. When a conflict erupts, it not only sweeps away decades of painstaking development efforts, but creates costs and consequences-economic, social, political, regional-that live on for decades. The outbreak of violent domestic conflict amounts to a spectacular failure of development-in essence, development in reverse. Even where countries initially manage to avoid violent conflict, large rents from natural resources can weaken state structures, and make governments less accountable, often leading to the emergence of secessionist rebellions, and all-out civil war. Although natural resources are never the sole source of conflict, and do not make conflict inevitable, the presence of abundant primary commodities, especially in low-income countries, exacerbates the risks of conflict and, if conflict does break out, tends to prolong it and makes it harder to resolve. As the Governance of Natural Resources Project (a research project) took shape, the discussion moved toward practical approaches and policies that could be adopted by the international community. This book presents the papers commissioned under the Governance of Natural Resources Project, offering a rich array of approaches and suggestions that are feeding into the international policy debate, and hopefully lead, over time to concerted international action, to help developing countries better manage their resource wealth, and turn this wealth into a driver of development rather than of conflict.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
What Do We Know about Natural Resources and Civil War?
Ross, M. L. (2004) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343304043773 · Cited by 1,358
China's engagement in Africa: scope, significance and consequences
Tull, D. M. (2006) · The Journal of Modern African Studies · doi:10.1017/s0022278x06001856 · Cited by 580
Onuoha, F. (2009) · African Security Review · doi:10.1080/10246029.2009.9627540 · Cited by 59
The effects of natural resources on human capital accumulation: A literature survey
Mousavi, A., & Clark, J. (2021) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12441 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Bannon, I., & Collier, P.
- Venue
- World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks
- Publisher
- The World Bank
- Published
- 2003-08-25
- OpenAlex
- W1591469690
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.72
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural Resources and Violent Conflict: Options and Actions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1596/0-8213-5503-1
- The paper
- Bannon, I., & Collier, P. (2003). Natural Resources and Violent Conflict: Options and Actions. World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-5503-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.