Reform Teams
Open accessAbstract
This note is about reform teams.They belong to an exclusive group of economies that grew out of poverty in less than 30 years. They also initially relied on a small, dedicated team of experts to get the job done. These teams brought to bear world-class skills along with direct access to the top level of government and a large development budget. That combination of skills, access, and resources gave them the clout to steer an ambitious reform agenda through vested interests and layers of government.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Foreign expertise was brought into Botswana's ministry to support implementation of rigorous project appraisal and cost-benefit analyses of public spending.
“Foreign expertise was brought into the ministry to support implementation of rigorous project appraisal and cost-benefit analyses of public spending (Criscuolo undated;Criscuolo and Palmade 2008).”
From Using Natural Resources for Development: Why Has It Proven So Difficult? (2016) · cites this paper as Criscuolo and Palmade 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using Natural Resources for Development: Why Has It Proven So Difficult?
Venables, A. J. (2016) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.30.1.161 · Cited by 634 · see citing works
- Authors
- Criscuolo, A., & Palmade, V.
- Venue
- World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks
- Publisher
- World Bank, Washington, DC
- Published
- 2008-02
- Pages
- 1-6
- OpenAlex
- W4409950309
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks (publishedVersion)
- The World Bank Open Knowledge Repository (World Bank) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Development › International Development and Aid
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic, financial, and policy analysis
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Keywords
- economic reform, institutional reform
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review