Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 639

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Financial Liberalization and Financial Fragility

Open access
Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli, Detragiache, Enrica·1999·Policy Research Working Papers

Abstract

A study of 53 countries during 1980-95 finds that financial liberalization increases the probability of a banking crisis, but less so where the institutional environment is strong.In particular, respect for the rule oflaw, a low level of corruption, and good contract enforcement are relevant institutional characteristics.The data also show that, after liberalization, financially repressed countries tend to have improved financial development even if they experience a banking crisis.This is not true for financially restrained countries.This paper's results support a cautious approach to financial liberalization where institutions are weak, even if macroeconomic stabilization has been achieved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1596/1813-9450-1917

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 639

Metadata

Authors
Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Detragiache, E.
Venue
Policy Research Working Papers
Published
1999-11-30
ISSN
1813-9450 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3126083968
Cited by
639
References
0
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Financial Liberalization and Financial Fragility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1596/1813-9450-1917
The paper
Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Detragiache, E. (1999). Financial Liberalization and Financial Fragility. Policy Research Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-1917

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.