The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Governance Matters VII: Aggregate And Individual Governance Indicators 1996-2007
Open accessAbstract
This paper reports on the latest update of the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) research project, covering 212 countries and territories and measuring six dimensions of governance between 1996 and 2007: Voice and Accountability, Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism, Government Effectiveness, Regulatory Quality, Rule of Law, and Control of Corruption. The latest aggregate indicators are based on hundreds of specific and disaggregated individual variables measuring various dimensions of governance, taken from 35 data sources provided by 32 different organizations. The data reflect the views on governance of public sector, private sector and NGO experts, as well as thousands of citizen and firm survey respondents worldwide. The authors also explicitly report the margins of error accompanying each country estimate. These reflect the inherent difficulties in measuring governance using any kind of data. The authors also briefly describe the evolution of the WGI since its inception, and show that the margins of error on the aggregate governance indicators have declined over the years, even though they still remain non-trivial. The authors find that even after taking margins of error into account, the WGI permit meaningful cross-country comparisons as well as monitoring progress over time. In less than a decade, a substantial number of countries exhibit statistically significant improvements in at least one dimension of governance, while other countries exhibit deterioration in some dimensions. These aggregate indicators, spanning more than a decade, together with the disaggregated individual indicators, are available at www.govindicators.org
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011) · Hague Journal on the Rule of Law · doi:10.1017/s1876404511200046 · Cited by 5,621
Self-citationThe Effect of Mandatory IFRS Adoption on Financial Analysts’ Information Environment
BYARD, D., LI, Y., & YU, Y. (2011) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-679x.2010.00390.x · Cited by 618
Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison
Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.937 · Cited by 184
(2009) · CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) · Cited by 161
Paths to Development: Is there a Bangladesh Surprise?
Asadullah, M. N., Savoia, A., & Mahmud, W. (2014) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.05.013 · Cited by 141
A longitudinal study of e-government maturity
Das, A., Singh, H., & Joseph, D. (2017) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.09.006 · Cited by 129
Investment in Relationship-Specific Assets: Does Finance Matter?
Strieborny, M., & Kukenova, M. (2016) · Review of Finance · doi:10.1093/rof/rfv049 · Cited by 26
National Culture and E-Government Readiness
Kovacic, Z. J. (2009) · International Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development · doi:10.4018/jicthd.2009040104 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M.
- Venue
- World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks
- Publisher
- World Bank, Washington, DC
- Published
- 2008-06
- OpenAlex
- W2132849250
- Cited by
- 1,061
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.