Cited by 42Media Influence and HealthHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

The Entertaining Way to Behavioral Change: Fighting HIV with MTV

Open access
Banerjee, Abhijit, La Ferrara, Eliana, Orozco-Olvera, Victor H.·2019·World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks

Abstract

This paper tests the effectiveness of an entertainment education television series, MTV Shuga, aimed at providing information and changing attitudes and behaviors related to HIV/AIDS. Using a simple model, the paper shows that “edutainment” can work through an individual or a social channel. This study is a randomized controlled trial conducted in urban Nigeria, where young viewers were exposed to MTV Shuga or a placebo television series. Among those exposed to MTV Shuga, the trial created additional variation in the social messages they received and the people with whom they watched the show. The study finds significant improvements in knowledge and attitudes toward HIV and risky sexual behavior. Treated subjects are twice as likely to get tested for HIV eight months after the intervention. The study also finds reductions in sexually transmitted diseases among women. These effects are stronger for viewers who reported being more involved with the narrative, consistent with the psychological underpinnings of edutainment. The trial’s experimental manipulations of the social norm component did not produce significantly different results from the main treatment. The individual effect of edutainment thus seems to have prevailed in the context of this study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1596/1813-9450-8998

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participants were also more knowledgeable about HIV: more likely to know about transmission and antiretroviral drugs.

    “Participants were also more knowledgeable about HIV: They were more likely to know about its transmission and about antiretroviral drugs.”

    From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Banerjee et al., 2019

    The indexed copy’s publication description reports significant improvements in HIV knowledge among young viewers exposed to MTV Shuga. It does not specify improved knowledge of HIV transmission or antiretroviral drugs; searches for those terms found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Banerjee et al. (2019), participants in the treatment group were twice as likely to get tested for HIV than the control group.

    “Eight months later, participants in the treatment group were twice as likely to get tested for HIV than the control group.”

    From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Banerjee et al., 2019

  • The likelihood of testing positive for chlamydia fell by 55% among women in the sample.

    “However, the likelihood of testing positive for chlamydia fell by 55% among women in the sample.”

    From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Banerjee et al., 2019

    The indexed passages contain a repository listing rather than the paper’s results. Searches for “chlamydia” and “55 percent” found no passage in our copy establishing the claimed reduction among women. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The show did not increase self-reported condom use.

    “The show did not increase self-reported condom use.”

    From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Banerjee et al., 2019

    The supplied passages and searches for “self-reported condom use” and “condom use MTV Shuga intervention self reported no significant effect” yielded no passage from the paper reporting condom-use results. Our copy therefore does not establish whether the show increased self-reported condom use. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banerjee, A., La Ferrara, E., & Orozco-Olvera, V. H.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks
Published
2019-09
OpenAlex
W3093658172
Cited by
42
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • The World Bank Open Knowledge Repository (World Bank) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
edutainment, entertainment-education, HIV prevention, HIV testing, sexual risk behavior, sexually transmitted infections, social norms, youth, Nigeria, narrative engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review